Re: glibc versions

2005-09-25 Thread wino
OK thanks for the info , if no-one else posts any warning or conflicting info I guess it should be ok. I may just rebuild with 3.3.6 just to see but having different compiler versions mixed is not a good idea Thanks again On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 07:30:49 +0200, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: glibc versions

2005-09-24 Thread Jesse Allen
On 9/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, > > I've been a bit slow to think if this but I do keep this system fairly > upto date, although not madly so. > > I am currently running gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r2 and glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 > > > Is there any recommended cutoff vers

re: glibc versions

2005-09-24 Thread dank
Jesse Allen wrote: > I just found out two days ago that Wine built with GCC 4.0 breaks > SecuRom protected games -- probably in signal handling. gcc-4.0.0 had a number of issues. gcc-4.0.1 fixed some of these. gcc-4.0.2 is just about to be released. Maybe you could try out gcc-4.0.2-rc3 when it co

Re: glibc versions

2005-09-24 Thread wino
Thanks, I've been a bit slow to think if this but I do keep this system fairly upto date, although not madly so. I am currently running gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r2 and glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 Is there any recommended cutoff versions for these work with wine-cvs or recent wine? TIA On Sun,

Re: glibc versions

2005-09-24 Thread Jesse Allen
On 9/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any issues with more recent glibc? > > I am looking to what has changed on my system since I had wine working > nicely a few months back. > > It occured to me that I probably have updated glibc at some point possibly > later then

glibc versions

2005-09-24 Thread wino
Are there any issues with more recent glibc? I am looking to what has changed on my system since I had wine working nicely a few months back. It occured to me that I probably have updated glibc at some point possibly later then the wine build that worked to well until I foolishly tried to