OK thanks for the info , if no-one else posts any warning or conflicting
info I guess it should be ok.
I may just rebuild with 3.3.6 just to see but having different compiler
versions mixed is not a good idea
Thanks again
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 07:30:49 +0200, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 9/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I've been a bit slow to think if this but I do keep this system fairly
> upto date, although not madly so.
>
> I am currently running gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r2 and glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1
>
>
> Is there any recommended cutoff vers
Jesse Allen wrote:
> I just found out two days ago that Wine built with GCC 4.0 breaks
> SecuRom protected games -- probably in signal handling.
gcc-4.0.0 had a number of issues.
gcc-4.0.1 fixed some of these.
gcc-4.0.2 is just about to be released.
Maybe you could try out gcc-4.0.2-rc3 when
it co
Thanks,
I've been a bit slow to think if this but I do keep this system fairly
upto date, although not madly so.
I am currently running gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r2 and glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1
Is there any recommended cutoff versions for these work with wine-cvs or
recent wine?
TIA
On Sun,
On 9/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any issues with more recent glibc?
>
> I am looking to what has changed on my system since I had wine working
> nicely a few months back.
>
> It occured to me that I probably have updated glibc at some point possibly
> later then
Are there any issues with more recent glibc?
I am looking to what has changed on my system since I had wine working
nicely a few months back.
It occured to me that I probably have updated glibc at some point possibly
later then the wine build that worked to well until I foolishly tried to