Vincent Povirk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul Vriens
> wrote:
>> The reason you see this is because next to a normal LoadLibrary we also use
>> the
>> .NET variant. On some boxes gdiplus.dll cannot be found through LoadLibrary
>> but
>> will
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> The reason you see this is because next to a normal LoadLibrary we also use
> the
> .NET variant. On some boxes gdiplus.dll cannot be found through LoadLibrary
> but
> will trough LoadLibraryShim. As winetest now thinks the l
On Mo, 2009-02-23 at 13:38 +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> >
> Is .NET installed (any version)?
My w2k test box has the popup about the missing gdiplus and
dotnet is installed.
>From the dllinfo:
gdiplus load error 1359
http://test.winehq.org/data/79cc4163fa4867ce0b28ce83111dc6bc18d3df15/2000_dr-a
t;>
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> On my w2k pro when I launch the winetest obtained from
>>>> test.winehq.org, I get a MessageBox saying gdiplus is missing, and
>>>> there's already some tests that load dlls dynamically (
>>>
>>>> On my w2k pro when I launch the winetest obtained from
>>>> test.winehq.org, I get a MessageBox saying gdiplus is missing, and
>>>> there's already some tests that load dlls dynamically (advpack,
>>>> cryptui, fusion) so thought
2009/2/23 Paul Vriens :
> Is .NET installed (any version)?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
Can't remember. I will check and report back this evening.
Nicolas Le Cam
quot;Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> On my w2k pro when I launch the winetest obtained from
>>> test.winehq.org, I get a MessageBox saying gdiplus is missing, and
t;>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On my w2k pro when I launch the winetest obtained from
>> test.winehq.org, I get a MessageBox saying gdiplus is missing, and
>> there's already some tests that load dlls dynamically (advpack,
>> cryptui, fusion) so though
get a MessageBox saying gdiplus is missing, and
> there's already some tests that load dlls dynamically (advpack,
> cryptui, fusion) so thought it was the right way.
>
> I will have a look on the winetest side.
>
> Nicolas Le Cam
>
>
>
The reason you see this
2009/2/23 Francois Gouget :
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>
>> This avoid a messagebox in regression tests on systems that don't have
>> GdiPlus.
>
>
> This seems wrong because winetest.exe is already supposed to check for
> missing dlls. If I remember correctly this was done explici
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> This avoid a messagebox in regression tests on systems that don't have
> GdiPlus.
This seems wrong because winetest.exe is already supposed to check for
missing dlls. If I remember correctly this was done explicitely so that
individual tests would
James Hawkins wrote:
On 5/25/07, Andrey Turkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> You also have to modify other files in order to integrate your stub
>> implementation to the wine build chain: Makefile.in, configure a
On Sa, 2007-05-26 at 23:37 +1000, Jeff L wrote:
> When adding a directory into the local repository I have found need to
> add the Makefiles and configure, etc, in addition the the configure.ac
1) git must know the new dll:
git update-index --add dlls//Makefile.in
2) run tools/make_makefiles
James Hawkins wrote:
On 5/25/07, Andrey Turkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> You also have to modify other files in order to integrate your stub
>> implementation to the wine build chain: Makefile.in, configure a
I think all the files that Mounir said to include are all modified
automatically or by Julliard
"You should not include any autogenerated code, that was created from
'autoconf' or a tool inside 'tools/' ( tools/make_makefiles or winedump as
examples), when you submit your Patch to winehq.org"
On
On 5/25/07, Andrey Turkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> You also have to modify other files in order to integrate your stub
>> implementation to the wine build chain: Makefile.in, configure and
>> configure.ac in
James Hawkins wrote:
On 5/25/07, Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
You also have to modify other files in order to integrate your stub
implementation to the wine build chain: Makefile.in, configure and
configure.ac in the wine root directory, Makefile.in in the "dlls"
directory.
T
On 5/25/07, Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
You also have to modify other files in order to integrate your stub
implementation to the wine build chain: Makefile.in, configure and
configure.ac in the wine root directory, Makefile.in in the "dlls"
directory.
The only file outside o
w.idrix.fr
Evan Stade wrote:
> Changelog:
> * added stub implementation of gdiplus.dll (3 files)
>
> dlls/gdiplus/Makefile.in | 16 +
> dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus.c| 45 +++
> dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus.spec | 609
> +
> 3 f
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:52:37 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote:
> Like the parent said, some installers don't ship with it, they expect
> the OS to have it. Office 2007 only runs on XP and higher and it
> expects the dll to already be there.
So we find some free application that contains it and install
On 6/16/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why? GDI+ is distributed with applications, so we can put off implementing
it for some time yet. Using Monos GDI+ means using the Windows build of
Cairo too; definitely a good idea IMHO as GDI+ is somewhat nontrivial and
the code has already been
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:56:04 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote:
> What do you mean? I looked at this before and even if we are to use
> libgdiplus we need some way to wrap it in a way the Windows app
> expects.
Why? GDI+ is distributed with applications, so we can put off implementing
it for some time y
.
Those are all my concerns.
Thanks,
Vijay
On 6/16/06, Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 6/15/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we rather use mono project's libgdiplus(gdiplus.dll
> implementation) than a stub implementation.
&g
Hi,
On 6/15/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we rather use mono project's libgdiplus(gdiplus.dll
implementation) than a stub implementation.
This will help in later implementing the .Net Compatibility Layer to Wine.
What do you mean? I looked at this befo
24 matches
Mail list logo
