Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> If ukai is affected, I would suspect uming (also from >> Arphic) >>> would be the same? and how many non-english fonts one >> want to >>> "work-around" like this? >> I've not seen any problems with uming. Mos

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If ukai is affected, I would suspect uming (also from > Arphic) > > would be the same? and how many non-english fonts one > want to > > "work-around" like this? > > I've not seen any problems with uming. Most > 'non-english' fonts w

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Huw Davies
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:38:26PM +, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, OTOH, should one expose the whole of fontconfig-available > fonts to wine? A lot of them may be dubious to various extent. Well we already did that anyway. It was ju

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's a bug in *native* gdiplus. If you install > ukai.ttf on > Windows then apps that use gdiplus will crash too. oh. I suppose it is fair enough that installing any fonts on windows can have bad effects. But, OTOH, should on

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Huw Davies
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:33:27PM +, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well yes, but that doesn't actually mean the patch is > > incorrect. > > Well, it is certainly doing something that the .NET framework doesn't like - > or, maybe exposi

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken > .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms > To: "Hin-Tak Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc:

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Huw Davies
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 02:05:25PM +, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > I found a .NET2/System.Windows.Forms application which was running alright > in 0.9.56/0.9.57 with the appdb adaptations broke in 0.9.58. So I did a git > bisect > and found that it is a commit to gdi32/freetype.c from Huw Davies whi

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Huw Davies
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 02:55:07PM +, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The error message I got was 'attempt to read or > > write protected memory. This is often > > > an indication that other memory is corrupt'. > > > > Hi, > > > > Co

Re: gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Wed, 26/3/08, Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The error message I got was 'attempt to read or > write protected memory. This is often > > an indication that other memory is corrupt'. > > Hi, > > Could you explain how this breaks .NET2, I can't see > why it should at the moment?

gdi32-related commit between 0.9.57<->0.9.58 broken .NET2/Systems.Windows.Forms

2008-03-26 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
I found a .NET2/System.Windows.Forms application which was running alright in 0.9.56/0.9.57 with the appdb adaptations broke in 0.9.58. So I did a git bisect and found that it is a commit to gdi32/freetype.c from Huw Davies which broke it. It is known that .NET does some strange things with font