Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>> Michael Pujos wrote:
>>
>>> I'm willing to resubmit this patch with updated tests
>>> against current Wine, but before I procceed
>>> I need to be sure it won't be rejected simply because it changes the
>>> pr
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Michael Pujos wrote:
>> I'm willing to resubmit this patch with updated tests
>> against current Wine, but before I procceed
>> I need to be sure it won't be rejected simply because it changes the
>> protocol.
>
> Server changes are tricky to ge
Michael Pujos wrote:
> I'm willing to resubmit this patch with updated tests
> against current Wine, but before I procceed
> I need to be sure it won't be rejected simply because it changes the protocol.
Server changes are tricky to get in.
You have to be patient and persistent.
I think your best
A few months ago I wrote a patch that addressed the following issues
with ReadDirectoryChangesW():
"1. move and rename of files and directories in a monitored directory are
not notified
2. the current implementation allow to only get one change
(FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION structure) at a time.
N
