Re: exec-shield patch take 6

2004-04-28 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:13:34 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > * figure out how to find the base address of the preloader at link time >so it's not hardcoded in the source. If it was dynamic we could simply walk the _DYNAMIC list, but as it's static I think /proc/self/maps is the only way. Of cou

Re: exec-shield patch take 6

2004-04-28 Thread Mike McCormack
Mike Hearn wrote: Go Mike! Good to see this work finally turn into a patch against CVS Well, there's a few things that probably need to be done before it can be applied: * consider turning it back into a standalone program rather than a shared object loader ... for portability, there may be p

Re: exec-shield patch take 6

2004-04-28 Thread Mike Hearn
Go Mike! Good to see this work finally turn into a patch against CVS :) On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 19:02 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > Description: > > This patch allows platforms using exec-shield patch against the Linux > kernel (eg. Fedora Core) to run Wine without disabling exec-shield. It also