Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-18 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 18, 2003 08:01 pm, Steven Edwards wrote: > What do you guys think about a move to a common system > for after wine 1.0? I'd say let's get to 0.9 and worry about it then... :) We are trying to use as many standard tools as possible, headers, etc. so we are moving in the right direction

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-18 Thread Steven Edwards
This is semi-offtopic but it would be nice if we could get WINE, ReactOS and Mingw to use the same docbook format and tools. There are parts of the WINE docs such as the regression test stuff that would be off use to us and other stuff in mingw. What do you guys think about a move to a common sy

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe you just compared the PostScript files? Our Makefile does not use > print.dsl for generating the PostScript files which I think is a bug! No I checked the pdf, all I could see was some spacing differences. I don't think it's a big problem. > So

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-18 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: [...] > print.dsl doesn't seem to have much effect on my machine so I guess we > could remove it. Maybe you just compared the PostScript files? Our Makefile does not use print.dsl for generating the PostScript files which I think is a bug! print.dsl

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-15 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess this means you like the current format better than the default > db2html/db2ps output. In that case it's probably best to just keep > default.dsl and print.dsl in the Wine CVS. print.dsl doesn't seem to have much effect on my machine so I gues

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-15 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Once this patch is applied, we can: > > -- move default.dsl and print.dsl into the tools/ module > > where they belong (and where make_winehq needs them) > > -- remove make_winehq from ou

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-15 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Well, it will change the documentation I generate when making a > release. It may not be a big deal, but I'm not sure it's worth the > trouble. Or you will need to tell me how I should configure my system > to still use the correct dsl files by defa

Re: documentation cleanup

2003-09-15 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Once this patch is applied, we can: > -- move default.dsl and print.dsl into the tools/ module > where they belong (and where make_winehq needs them) > -- remove make_winehq from our documentation dir, > as it's been made obsolete by t

documentation cleanup

2003-09-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
OK, This should explain a bit more what I meant to say with this silly .dsl files. First, use the standard ones when building HTML and PS. This means that the docu will be build with the user's L&F which is the right thing to do IMO. If we don't do that, we might as well give up on SGML, it create