I am beginning to suspect a problem with wine_server_call. I am confused
because I would have thought this was something that is pretty solid.
In HOOK_CallHooks we call SERVER_START_REQ( start_hook_chain ). When I put
debugging in the server I see that reply->active_hooks is getting properly
set
Alexandre,
> The idea is that active_hooks is a shortcut to avoid calling the
> server if we know that a hook is not set. If we don't have a valid
> active_hooks then we need to call the server, which will then tell us
> whether or not we really have a hook to call.
I don't know if this matters,
"Phil Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Active_hooks is pretty much set by the server. Bit 0x8000 is set to
> indicate that the bitmask is valid. One of my suspicions that I hope to
> confirm with debug is that in my case of failure active_hooks is 0.
>
> Would it not make more sense to
o figure out the real problem of why
active_hooks is 0.
Thanks,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Lodwick
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 4:25 PM
To: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: dlls/user/hook.c HOOK_CallHooks() help
Hi,
I hav
Hi,
I have an application that is hitting the assert in HOOK_CallHooks.
--
trace:hook:HOOK_CallHooks calling hook in thread 0113 WH_CALLWNDPROC code 0
wp 0 lp 7fbef984
err:hook:HOOK_CallHooks Unknown hook id 4
wine-pthread: hook.c:381: HOOK_CallHooks: Assertion `0' failed.
--
Basically I
