On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> Hmm, so srcidx is unused. Yes, that piece of code is useless now, it's
> a remnant of an older version of that function where the source
> register was handled by some ad-hoc code, which I since then replaced
> with a call to the generic This->funcs->srcre
2010/8/18 Gerald Pfeifer :
> Metteo et al,
>
> I noticed d3dx9_36/bytecodewriter.c can be simplified as follows, but
> somewhat tells me this may rather point out a problem somewhere in that
> code, so I am not sending this to wine-patches.
>
> (The only functional difference should be the missing
Metteo et al,
I noticed d3dx9_36/bytecodewriter.c can be simplified as follows, but
somewhat tells me this may rather point out a problem somewhere in that
code, so I am not sending this to wine-patches.
(The only functional difference should be the missing WARN in some cases,
and I could restore
