Re: dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c - Bugfix in test!

2005-03-19 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Jakob Eriksson wrote: Now I know. If the error was ERROR_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE, it's ok, we don't care. Move on. NT4 has this behaviour. If it isn't, but ret is 0, AKA LookupPrivilegeName() failed, I wan't to know exactly what the error was. It's a trace. So I think the patch is v

Re: dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c - Bugfix in test!

2005-03-19 Thread Filip Navara
Jakob Eriksson wrote: Jakob Eriksson wrote: Alexandre Julliard wrote: Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 - 1.12 +++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 - @@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ luid.LowPart = i

Re: dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c - Bugfix in test!

2005-03-19 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Jakob Eriksson wrote: Alexandre Julliard wrote: Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 - 1.12 +++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 - @@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ luid.LowPart = i; cchName = si

Re: dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c - Bugfix in test!

2005-03-18 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c 14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 - 1.12 +++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c 16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 - @@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ luid.LowPart = i; cchName = sizeof(buf); ret = pLookup

Re: dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c - Bugfix in test!

2005-03-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Jakob Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 - 1.12 > +++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 - > @@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ > luid.LowPart = i; > cchName = sizeof(buf); > ret = pLookupPr