Re: dll name length (was: Windows dll replacement with Linux library)

2004-01-08 Thread Dan Timis
Thanks. I will try it and tell you if it worked. It may take a couple of weeks since we are frantically preparing for a trade show, then going to the trade show. Dan On Thursday, January 8, 2004, at 07:38 AM, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On January 6, 2004 10:04 pm, Dan Timis wrote: I finally fig

Re: dll name length (was: Windows dll replacement with Linux library)

2004-01-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On January 6, 2004 10:04 pm, Dan Timis wrote: > I finally figured out what my problem was. If the name of the library > is "USBUtils" it works, if it is "USBDeviceUtils" it doesn't. Actually > the max length I can use is 11 characters. That is probably 15 > characters including ".dll" > > In my

Re: dll name length

2004-01-07 Thread Eric Pouech
Dan Timis a écrit : I finally figured out what my problem was. If the name of the library is "USBUtils" it works, if it is "USBDeviceUtils" it doesn't. Actually the max length I can use is 11 characters. That is probably 15 characters including ".dll" In my config file all filesystems are "w

dll name length (was: Windows dll replacement with Linux library)

2004-01-06 Thread Dan Timis
I finally figured out what my problem was. If the name of the library is "USBUtils" it works, if it is "USBDeviceUtils" it doesn't. Actually the max length I can use is 11 characters. That is probably 15 characters including ".dll" In my config file all filesystems are "win95" The version i