Ok, I didnt know and that changes everything. From now on I'll keep
that in mind.
Sorry for the noise.
2011/6/4 Vitaliy Margolen :
> On 06/04/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Zawacki wrote:
>>>
>>> Sometimes apps depend on the crash. Since your change comes with a
>>> test case, it looks reasonable to me, a
On 06/04/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Zawacki wrote:
Sometimes apps depend on the crash. Since your change comes with a
test case, it looks reasonable to me, although you might check the
specific HRESULT rather than just FAILED.
Exactly, it's not a crash on Windows. I'll resend it with an explicit tes
> Sometimes apps depend on the crash. Since your change comes with a
> test case, it looks reasonable to me, although you might check the
> specific HRESULT rather than just FAILED.
Exactly, it's not a crash on Windows. I'll resend it with an explicit test.
I was thinking of this more as "janito
> I don't. I just thought that a case where Wine misbehaving causes a
> crash was worth fixing.
Sometimes apps depend on the crash. Since your change comes with a
test case, it looks reasonable to me, although you might check the
specific HRESULT rather than just FAILED.
--Juan
> Do you have an example of such application? And the bug in bugzilla?
>
I don't. I just thought that a case where Wine misbehaving causes a
crash was worth fixing.
On 06/03/2011 04:19 PM, Lucas Fialho Zawacki wrote:
In the absence of this check apps passing a NULL pointer as callback to
EnumDevices segfault under Wine.
Do you have an example of such application? And the bug in bugzilla?
Vitaliy.
