http://www.winehq.org/webalizer/
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 03:22, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> > The website stats are interesting too:
> Are these available somewhere?
>
> Ivan.
--
Jeremy Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CodeWeavers, Inc.
> The website stats are interesting too:
Are these available somewhere?
Ivan.
> Check that out - 5mb of patches for the last 3 months running. A meg of
> patches just 6 days into the new month already!
>
> It seems Wine is moving faster than ever before.
The website stats are interesting too:
Daily Avg | Monthly Totals
Hits
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:57, Rein Klazes wrote:
> Are you talking about a compressed tar bal perhaps?
Yes, sorry, 10mb is for the compressed tarball. The real tree is far
larger - I thought that sounded a bit suspicious when I wrote it, but
wasn't thinking straight :(
> $ find wine -type f|xargs
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:38:26 +0100, you wrote:
> To put things in perspective, the Wine source tree is 10mb - that means in
> only 2 months as many lines of patch were generated as exists in Wine
> itself!
Are you talking about a compressed tar bal perhaps?
$ find wine -type f|xargs cat |wc -lc
Hey guys,
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/
Check that out - 5mb of patches for the last 3 months running. A meg of
patches just 6 days into the new month already!
It seems Wine is moving faster than ever before.
To put things in perspective, the Wine source tree is 10mb - that me