Re: desktop mode again

2004-01-30 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Alex Pasadyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can do that, if it would get applied. :) I sent an earlier version > of the sysmetrics patch by itself a long time ago, and it was not > applied because it could give incorrect results in desktop mode. This > version is cleaner that that one, and I t

RE: desktop mode again

2004-01-30 Thread Robert Shearman
Alex Pasadyn wrote: > > Robert Shearman wrote: > > > I suggest you put the system metrics stuff in a separate patch. > It is a lot more tested and more likely to get in than the other > code, which is quite a big change. > > I can do that, if it would get applied. :) I sent an earlier version > o

Re: desktop mode again

2004-01-28 Thread Alex Pasadyn
Robert Shearman wrote: I suggest you put the system metrics stuff in a separate patch. It is a lot more tested and more likely to get in than the other code, which is quite a big change. I can do that, if it would get applied. :) I sent an earlier version of the sysmetrics patch by itself a lon

Re: desktop mode again

2004-01-28 Thread Robert Shearman
I apologise in advance if this message is poorly formatted. Blame webmail for that. Alex Pasadyn wrote: > ChangeLog: > - Make a separate process for the Wine desktop window > - In desktop mode, all applications share one desktop window > - Ensure system metrics are accurate for all processes aft