Re: dead stores in netapi32

2008-11-19 Thread Kai Blin
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 00:10:52 Juan Lang wrote: > > Does that netbios code actually work? IIRC you need to bind to port 137 > > to do netbios requests. > > That's not strictly true, you can be a client without binding to port > 137. You just can't advertise any services. I haven't tried i

Re: dead stores in netapi32

2008-11-18 Thread Juan Lang
> Does that netbios code actually work? IIRC you need to bind to port 137 to do > netbios requests. That's not strictly true, you can be a client without binding to port 137. You just can't advertise any services. I haven't tried it myself in a long, long time, though I did hear from a couple pe

Re: dead stores in netapi32

2008-11-18 Thread Kai Blin
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 23:13:38 ricardo filipe wrote: > hi juan! > > i'm tracking some dead stores with Clang and i've found some in files you > created that i'm not comfortable messing with. Does that netbios code actually work? IIRC you need to bind to port 137 to do netbios requests. I ca

dead stores in netapi32

2008-11-18 Thread ricardo filipe
hi juan! i'm tracking some dead stores with Clang and i've found some in files you created that i'm not comfortable messing with. file dlls/netapi32/nbt.c: lines: 419 839 1185 1192 1201 file dlls/netapi32/netbios.c: lines: 634 636 i thought you might want to have a look at it :) regards,