H. Verbeet wrote:
> I could live with that, although perhaps just "reference_description"
> and "wined3d_description" would be better.
Then "better" you shall have. :)
-- Andy.
On 15/08/06, Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In which case, would you be happy with the suggested names on the lines
marked Var 1 and Var 2 below?
I could live with that, although perhaps just "reference_description"
and "wined3d_description" would be better.
H. Verbeet wrote:
> I assume you're talking about direct3d.c in ddraw then.
Sorry, yes.
> The second
> parameter is the "device description" for the enumerated device. The
> first device is the reference device, the second one is our wined3d
> implementation.
In which case, would you be happy
