>> Please add an additional test that passes in non-null flags that
>don't match
>> standard R5G6B5.
>
>I'm not exactly sure what you mean with this. The other test has mask
>of
>R5G5B5. The one that's missing is R5G6B5, but I don't think it's
>needed.
E.g. a red mask of 0xf0f0, green 0x0f00 and
On 05/09/2011 10:11 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2011 20:55:21 Ričardas Barkauskas wrote:
>> +modes16bpp_cnt = 0;
>> +U2(ddsd.ddpfPixelFormat).dwRBitMask = 0x;
>> +U3(ddsd.ddpfPixelFormat).dwGBitMask = 0x;
>> +U4(ddsd.ddpfPixelFormat).dwBBitMask = 0x;
>
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10820
Your paranoid android
On Monday 09 May 2011 20:55:21 Ričardas Barkauskas wrote:
> +modes16bpp_cnt = 0;
> +U2(ddsd.ddpfPixelFormat).dwRBitMask = 0x;
> +U3(ddsd.ddpfPixelFormat).dwGBitMask = 0x;
> +U4(ddsd.ddpfPixelFormat).dwBBitMask = 0x;
Please add an additional test that passes in non-null f
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=10648
Your paranoid android
