Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5248
Your paranoid android.
Am 18.08.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> +if(DDSD->ddsCaps.dwCaps & DDSCAPS_FRONTBUFFER) {
> +WARN("Application tried to create an explicit front buffer\n");
> LeaveCriticalSection(&ddraw_cs);
> return DDERR_INVALIDCAPS;
> }
This test seems redundant now.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4557
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4356
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4348
Your paranoid android.
On Wednesday 04 August 2010 10:10:17 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am 03.08.2010
um 21:26 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> > DirectX 1 interface allowed creation
of explicit back buffers, so move
> > the restrictive checks to DirectX 2+
implementations. Don't permit
> > creating of primary surface back buffe
Am 03.08.2010 um 21:26 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> DirectX 1 interface allowed creation of explicit back buffers, so move the
> restrictive checks to DirectX 2+ implementations. Don't permit creating of
> primary surface back buffer.
The patch(as well as 9 and 10) look OK to me. Patch 6 is OK too
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4260
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4186
Your paranoid android.