2008/7/30 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> DeviceLoadTest is quite big, does splitting up make sense? Otherwise, what
> you say is fair enough - I do not care too much about code beauty in the
> tests as long as the tests work(since one hardly ever reads the test or does
> lots of work on it,
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> DeviceLoadTest is quite big, does splitting up make sense? Otherwise, what
> you say is fair enough - I do not care too much about code beauty in the
> tests as long as the tests work(since one hardly ever reads the test or does
> lots of work on it, and the Windows apps we
> There are some tests after that block not related to cubemap which I
> don't want
> to skip. Other options are moving cubemap block of code to the end (so
> that I
> can return then) or skipping the block by goto, but none of this are
> really
> better IMO.
DeviceLoadTest is quite big, does split
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> skip("No cubemap support\n");
> if you return right after that you wouldn't have to change the indention on
> all the rest of the code
There are some tests after that block not related to cubemap which I don't want
to skip. Other options are moving cubemap block of code
In the worst
case just abort on a CreateSurface error
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wine-patches-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Dorofeyev
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ddraw/tests: Skip cubema
