Am 22.01.2013 20:26, schrieb Eric Pouech:
> Le 21/01/2013 20:26, André Hentschel a écrit :
>> Am 21.01.2013 10:50, schrieb Eric Pouech:
+if ((frame->AddrPC.Mode == AddrModeFlat) &&
+(frame->AddrFrame.Mode != AddrModeFlat))
>>> this looks strange to me.
>>> I guess, you
Le 21/01/2013 20:26, André Hentschel a écrit :
Am 21.01.2013 10:50, schrieb Eric Pouech:
+if ((frame->AddrPC.Mode == AddrModeFlat) &&
+(frame->AddrFrame.Mode != AddrModeFlat))
this looks strange to me.
I guess, you want to check that both mode address modes are AddrModeFlat
Am 21.01.2013 10:50, schrieb Eric Pouech:
>> +if ((frame->AddrPC.Mode == AddrModeFlat) &&
>> +(frame->AddrFrame.Mode != AddrModeFlat))
> this looks strange to me.
> I guess, you want to check that both mode address modes are AddrModeFlat
> A+
>
it's the same as for the other a
> +if ((frame->AddrPC.Mode == AddrModeFlat) &&
> +(frame->AddrFrame.Mode != AddrModeFlat))
this looks strange to me.
I guess, you want to check that both mode address modes are AddrModeFlat
A+
--
Eric Pouech