On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, "Luis C. Busquets Pérez" wrote:
> The number of functions reported in
> http://www.winehq.org/site/winapi_stats
> for the following dlls is
>
> d3dx9_24 308
[...]
That's because d3dx9_36 has some forwards to functions that have not
been declared in d3dx8, not even as a
The number of functions reported in
http://www.winehq.org/site/winapi_stats
for the following dlls is
d3dx9_24308
d3dx9_25311
d3dx9_26315
d3dx9_27315
d3dx9_28320
d3dx9_29320
d3dx9_30320
d3dx9_31317
d3dx9_32322
d3dx9_33
> Find attached some data on d3dx8, d3dx9_xx and d3dx10_xx implementations:
> dll files by d3dx extension:
> d3dx8 1 dll files
> d3dx9_xx 13 dll files
> d3dx10_xx 4 dll files
> [...]
>
Nice work, how did you get the data?
Did you run Dependency Walker on e
Find attached some data on d3dx8, d3dx9_xx and d3dx10_xx implementations:
dll files by d3dx extension:
d3dx8 1 dll files
d3dx9_xx 13 dll files
d3dx10_xx 4 dll files
Functions included in each d3dx:
DLL Number of functions
d3dx8 153
d3dx9_24 320
Hi!
> +@ stdcall D3DXVec2Normalize(ptr ptr) d3dx8.D3DXVec3Normalize
Shouldn't it be "d3dx8.D3DXVec2Normalize"?
This line is copy-pasted 13 times around the patch.
--
Maciej Kowalczyk