[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Okay, I now have spent some time on analysing the differences of the dlls
> (at least regarding to what functions they provide). So just a few questions
> from my side to make sure the next version of the patch will be what you
> expect:
> 1. Really just to ensure that
> Please stop resending that big patch again and again, it's not going in,
> it's full of problems. You need to provide correct forwards for all
> functions instead of stubs, and the functions need to match the Windows
> ones, you can't just copy the same spec file 12 times. Also the code was
> wri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Forwarding d3dx9_24...35 functions to d3dx9_36 now.
Please stop resending that big patch again and again, it's not going in,
it's full of problems. You need to provide correct forwards for all
functions instead of stubs, and the functions need to match the Windows
ones
Hi,
As it was in David Adam's patch case, here also you are forwarding
d3dx8.D3DXVec3Normalize as D3DXVec2Normalize.
I think it's a typo and strikes me so much because it's a first line of
the specfile.
I'm new to Wine, so please correct me if I'm wrong.
Maciej
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:23:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh okay, I resent a fixed patch.
> Why isn't it possible to forward the functions of the other dlls to the d3dx8
> ones?
> Or is this just for keeping the code clean so that we don't have mixed d3dx8
> and d3dx9_36 forwardings?
Oh okay, I resent a fixed patch.
Why isn't it possible to forward the functions of the other dlls to the d3dx8
ones?
Or is this just for keeping the code clean so that we don't have mixed d3dx8
and d3dx9_36 forwardings?
You need to forward the functions of d3dx9_xx.dll (xx from 24 to 35) to the
ones of d3dx9_36.dll
Only the functions of d3dx9_36.dll can be forwarded to the ones of d3dx8.dll
David
-
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Y
