n is well coded, this function should not be
>> called often. Usually an application uses transformations matrices that
>> are a lot easier to inverse
>>
>> Nozomi
>>
>>
>> ------------
>> *De :* Henri Verbeet
>> *À :* Rico Schü
se
Nozomi
*De :* Henri Verbeet
*À :* Rico Schüller
*Cc :* wine-devel@winehq.org; Nozomi Kodama
*Envoyé le :* Lundi 25 février 2013 0h08
*Objet :* Re: d3dx9: Avoid expensive computations
On 25 February 2013 10:24, Rico Schüller mailto:kgbric...@web.de>> wrote:
> I d
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:08:02AM +0100, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 25 February 2013 10:24, Rico Sch?ller wrote:
> > I did some small tests for speed with the following results. You may also
> > avoid such a lot of variable assignments like *pout = out and you may use 4
> > vecs instead. This shou
On 25 February 2013 12:26, Rico Schüller wrote:
> Is there a reason why we don't use sse instructions? Or did just no one had
> a look at it yet?
I think on the one hand there hasn't been much of a need so far, and
on the other hand you'd probably need something along the lines of
STT_GNU_IFUNC t
De : Henri Verbeet
À : Rico Schüller
Cc : wine-devel@winehq.org; Nozomi Kodama
Envoyé le : Lundi 25 février 2013 0h08
Objet : Re: d3dx9: Avoid expensive computations
On 25 February 2013 10:24, Rico Schüller wrote:
> I did some small tests for speed with
On 25.02.2013 11:08, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 25 February 2013 10:24, Rico Schüller wrote:
I did some small tests for speed with the following results. You may also
avoid such a lot of variable assignments like *pout = out and you may use 4
vecs instead. This should save ~48 assignments and it s
On 25 February 2013 10:24, Rico Schüller wrote:
> I did some small tests for speed with the following results. You may also
> avoid such a lot of variable assignments like *pout = out and you may use 4
> vecs instead. This should save ~48 assignments and it should also improve
> the speed a bit mo
On 25.02.2013 06:03, Nozomi Kodama wrote:
+out.u.m[2][i] = v.z / signed_det;
+out.u.m[3][i] = v.w / signed_det;
}
*pout = out;
While you are at it, you may fix the indentation of out*, "}", "*pout =
out;" and "return pout;".
> signed_det = (i % 2)? -det: det;
Couldn't you
