no, you just need to override CFLAGS when using configure...
CFLAGS="blha" ./configure
A+
--
Eric Pouech
Dimi Paun wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 14:58 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
I used something like CFLAGS="-g -Wbrief
-wd108,144,167,181,188,193,279,556,810,869,981,1287,1418,1419,1572"
I suppose these disables some warnings. Wouldn't they be useful
for Wine if fixed?
well, not all of them
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 14:58 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> > I used something like CFLAGS="-g -Wbrief
> > -wd108,144,167,181,188,193,279,556,810,869,981,1287,1418,1419,1572"
I suppose these disables some warnings. Wouldn't they be useful
for Wine if fixed?
--
Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Latt
Eric Pouech wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
That's expected. To support icc, one would have to adjust the
commandline options a bit depending on the compiler being used.
In particular, one would want to suppress many compiler warnings
like the ones you mentioned. icc provides a nice way of suppressin
Eric Pouech wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
That's expected. To support icc, one would have to adjust the
commandline options a bit depending on the compiler being used.
In particular, one would want to suppress many compiler warnings
like the ones you mentioned. icc provides a nice way of suppressin
Dan Kegel wrote:
That's expected. To support icc, one would have to adjust the
commandline options a bit depending on the compiler being used.
In particular, one would want to suppress many compiler warnings
like the ones you mentioned. icc provides a nice way of suppressing
any desired set of
Dan Kegel wrote:
On 10/16/05, Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting some errors when compiling wine which I was able to fix, but
World of Warcraft won't start... Will icc be supported at some time in
the furure?
Maybe, especially if people who want it supported pitch in
by r
That's expected. To support icc, one would have to adjust the
commandline options a bit depending on the compiler being used.
In particular, one would want to suppress many compiler warnings
like the ones you mentioned. icc provides a nice way of suppressing
any desired set of warnings.
On 10/16/05, Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting some errors when compiling wine which I was able to fix, but
> World of Warcraft won't start... Will icc be supported at some time in
> the furure?
Maybe, especially if people who want it supported pitch in
by running the Wine
Tomas Carnecky wrote:
anyone already tried that?
I'm getting some errors when compiling wine which I was able to fix, but
World of Warcraft won't start... Will icc be supported at some time in
the furure?
tom
last time I checked, icc didn't support stdcall calling convention,
which is ra
anyone already tried that?
I'm getting some errors when compiling wine which I was able to fix, but
World of Warcraft won't start... Will icc be supported at some time in
the furure?
tom
11 matches
Mail list logo