Felix Nawothnig wrote:
This could be fixed by adding a _ prefix.
Adding another prefix fixes nothing. The original Windows SDK headers
don't export a symbol, and we do. It's simply good practice to try and
be as close as possible to the original SDK.
Mike
Mike McCormack wrote:
I'm curious, what is the reason for the special case handling for MSVC
and GCC when we have to do the portable way anyway?
I can see two reasons:
* The portable way adds a (non-standard) symbol.
This could be fixed by adding a _ prefix.
* The static string declaration m
Felix Nawothnig wrote:
+#define WC_STATICA"Static"
+#if defined(__GNUC__)
+# define WC_STATICW (const WCHAR []){ 'S','t','a', 't','i','c',0 }
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
+# define WC_STATICW L"Static"
+#else
+static const WCHAR WC_STATICW[] = { 'S','t','a','t','i','c',0 };
+#endif
+#define WC_
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
+#define WC_STATICA "Static"
+#if defined(__GNUC__)
+# define WC_STATICW (const WCHAR []){ 'S','t','a', 't','i','c',0 }
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
+# define WC_STATICW L"Static"
+#else
+static const WCHAR WC_STATICW[] = { 'S','t','a','t','i','c',0 };
+#endif
+#define WC_STAT
"Felix Nawothnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Richter wrote:
+#define WC_STATICA "Static"
+#if defined(__GNUC__)
+# define WC_STATICW (const WCHAR []){ 'S','t','a', 't','i','c',0 }
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
+# define WC_STATICW L"Static"
+#else
+static const WCHAR WC_STATICW[] = { 'S','t','
Frank Richter wrote:
+#define WC_STATICA "Static"
+#if defined(__GNUC__)
+# define WC_STATICW (const WCHAR []){ 'S','t','a', 't','i','c',0 }
+#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
+# define WC_STATICW L"Static"
+#else
+static const WCHAR WC_STATICW[] = { 'S','t','a','t','i','c',0 };
+#endif
+#define WC_STA
