wrong with development process.
>
> I think that current development process isn't a problem at all. In fact
> AJ is very good at what he is doing!
> As far as I understand your patch ("comctl32: Fix invalid syntax.") was
> rejected just because you forgot t
sn't a problem at all. In
fact AJ
is very good at what he is doing!
As far as I understand your patch ("comctl32: Fix invalid syntax.") was
rejected just because you forgot to add proper (descriptive) changelog entry.
What is the real problem is the lack of test
hi base,
>> If winehq.org is Alexandre's own property, this is something
>> fundametally wrong again.
Well.. then 'something' must be wrong with the linux kernel aswell.. how comes
noone forked? hmmm..
> You may try to learn how things work in the Wine project by reading
> the following threa
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Bang Jun-young wrote:
[...]
> In fact, this is a well known mistake many newbie Win32 developers
> make (and fix in minutes). It shouldn't have been in the tree in the
> first place if he actually have read the patch.
News flash!!!
You too are allowed to review patches posted
"Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> People prefer to follow Alexandre's tree but nobody forces them to use it.
>
> If winehq.org is Alexandre's own property, this is something
> fundametally wrong again.
You may try to learn how things work in the Wine project by reading
the following
Bang Jun-young wrote:
>In fact, this is a well known mistake many newbie Win32 developers
>make (and fix in minutes). It shouldn't have been in the tree in the
>first place if he actually have read the patch. There are a lot of
>easily catchable bugs in the tree, for example, potential security
>ho
On 2/7/08, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bang Jun-young wrote:
> > On 2/7/08, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> "Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> 18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
> >>>
> >>> This fix i
Bang Jun-young wrote:
> On 2/7/08, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> 18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
>>>
>>> This fix is required for Wine to be built with VC2005/2008 (although
>>> Alexand
On 2/7/08, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
> >
> > This fix is required for Wine to be built with VC2005/2008 (although
> > Alexandre doesn't seem to care ab
"Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
>
> This fix is required for Wine to be built with VC2005/2008 (although
> Alexandre doesn't seem to care about it).
There's no need to count the hours, or to ask every day, e
18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
This fix is required for Wine to be built with VC2005/2008 (although
Alexandre doesn't seem to care about it).
On 2/6/08, Bang Jun-young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason why this hasn't been committed?
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
