Vitaliy Margolen writes:
> I'm guessing AJ doesn't care much about such details. So NVM.
>
> Anyone want's to remove any requirements to wine tests? As long as
> they compile and pass on AJ's pc, is seems to be the only requirement.
The tests are supposed to succeed. Writing fancy failure messag
I'm guessing AJ doesn't care much about such details. So NVM.
Anyone want's to remove any requirements to wine tests? As long as they
compile and pass on AJ's pc, is seems to be the only requirement.
Vitaliy.
On 05/09/2011 08:42 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 5/9/2011 17:39, Vitaliy Margolen wr
On 5/9/2011 17:39, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 05/09/2011 01:09 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Fix for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25908
There are 3 separate changes in this patch:
-BOOL bSame;
+BOOL same;
Variable name rename.
I don't think it's a big deal.
The actual fix wi
On 05/09/2011 01:09 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Fix for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25908
There are 3 separate changes in this patch:
-BOOL bSame;
+BOOL same;
Variable name rename.
The actual fix with new test.
+ok(g_editbox_disp_info.item.pszText != NULL, "got %p\n",
