On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Julian Rüger wrote:
> Sorry for nagging ;)
>
> Wasn't the convention to assume an 80-character wide terminal?
> This line would wrap, then.
>
> So the linefeed is not totally pointless here. Please correct me, if I'm
> mistaken.
Either we wrap it manually assuming a terminal
Sorry for nagging ;)
Wasn't the convention to assume an 80-character wide terminal?
This line would wrap, then.
So the linefeed is not totally pointless here. Please correct me, if I'm
mistaken.
Best regards,
Julian
Am Mittwoch, den 03.04.2013, 16:07 +0200 schrieb Francois Gouget:
> ---
> prog
