Re: c2man comment rejection

2005-11-03 Thread Dimi Paun
From: "Markus Amsler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I identified 80 function comments, that have a description and a PARAMS > section, but no RETURNS section. Let's be explicit, we're only talking about 80 funcs anyway. -- Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lattica, Inc.

Re: c2man comment rejection

2005-11-03 Thread James Hawkins
On 11/3/05, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I identified 80 function comments, that have a description and a PARAMS > section, but no RETURNS section. IMHO it would generate in most cases > acceptable documentation, but gets rejected because of the missing > RETURNS section. > >

c2man comment rejection

2005-11-03 Thread Markus Amsler
Hi, I identified 80 function comments, that have a description and a PARAMS section, but no RETURNS section. IMHO it would generate in most cases acceptable documentation, but gets rejected because of the missing RETURNS section. 2 possible fixes: - patch c2man so it accepts also PARAMS sect