Tony, can you empower me to empower other people, since I have already
been empowered to fix bugs, and I got his request email last night?
Tom
Tony Lambregts wrote:
Michael Jung wrote:
Hi,
I would like to change the status of bug 4322 to FIXED, but I'm not
'empowered' to do it. Whom do I ha
Michael Jung wrote:
Hi,
I would like to change the status of bug 4322 to FIXED, but I'm not
'empowered' to do it. Whom do I have to talk to?
Bye,
One of them is me.
You are now empowered.
--
Tony Lambregts
Hi,
I would like to change the status of bug 4322 to FIXED, but I'm not
'empowered' to do it. Whom do I have to talk to?
Bye,
--
Michael Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dimi Paun wrote:
Third, Jonathan has done a lot of good work, and I find it way
over the top to remove his Bugzilla account over this issue.
In fact I didn't, I suspended it til I could get hold of him and we could discuss it and now all is
fine and everyone is happy. Peace and
rd, Jonathan has done a lot of good work, and I find it way
> over the top to remove his Bugzilla account over this issue.
> Yes, this may have been handled better, etc. but I see no reason
> for such drastic measures. I don't know who removed his account,
> but this was done with _way_ les
usand bugs in that state. They do more
harm then good lingering about. If the original reporter can not be
bothered to verify it, they should be closed.
Third, Jonathan has done a lot of good work, and I find it way
over the top to remove his Bugzilla account over this issue.
Yes, this may have be
Jonathan Ernst wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday, after having manually closed some old fixed bugs, I discussed
with infyquest and tlambregts on irc and tlambregts told us that instead
of manually closing the bugs, bugzilla had a "change several bugs at
once function"
It was then discussed that bugs that a
Well i think it should be like this
The verified bugs may/not (je ne pas) be re-opened and only resolved
bugs can be re-opened.
And closed state is equivalent verified state.
And Verified state does not have all the sub states like LATER, CLOSED,...
bye,
Vijay
On 10/27/05, Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL P
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 14:56 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju a écrit :
> Hi,
> Yesterday there was a session indeed but there was misunderstanding
> regarding the bug status, ie, RESOLVED LATER, RESOLVED CLOSED,
> VERIFIED, etc.
> It would be better if we could put some details regarding the bug
> s
Hi,
Yesterday there was a session indeed but there was misunderstanding
regarding the bug status, ie, RESOLVED LATER, RESOLVED CLOSED,
VERIFIED, etc.
It would be better if we could put some details regarding the bug
status on the bugzilla or FAQ pages, as there are some differences in
the explanat
Hi,
Yesterday, after having manually closed some old fixed bugs, I discussed
with infyquest and tlambregts on irc and tlambregts told us that instead
of manually closing the bugs, bugzilla had a "change several bugs at
once function"
It was then discussed that bugs that are FIXED and where resolu
11 matches
Mail list logo
