On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:32:20PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
> Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> > It might make sense to rename "Abandoned?" to needmoreinfo, so
> > that one can key a bug as needmoreinfo and after x month with
> > that keyword and no response resolve it abandoned.
> >
> > Though we probab
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
>
> It might make sense to rename "Abandoned?" to needmoreinfo, so
> that one can key a bug as needmoreinfo and after x month with
> that keyword and no response resolve it abandoned.
>
> Though we probably don't want to use needmoreinfo on bugs where
> it's possible for someon
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:59:52PM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 7:02 PM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:19:35AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > >> Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
> > > >
> > > >There is no need to add one more reason fo
On Jan 5, 2008 7:02 PM, James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > Dan Kegel wrote:
> >
> Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
>
> >>> There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
> >>> INVALID with appropriate comment does the job.
On Jan 5, 2008 7:02 PM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:19:35AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > >> Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
> > >
> > >There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
> > >INVALID with appropriate comment does the j
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:19:35AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >> Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
> >
> >There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
> >INVALID with appropriate comment does the job.
>
> INVALID seems harsh, it may scare away novice reporters.
Yes if i
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
>>> There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
>>> INVALID with appropriate comment does the job.
>>>
>> INVALID seems harsh, it may scare away novice reporters.
Dan Kegel wrote:
>>> Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
>> There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
>> INVALID with appropriate comment does the job.
>
> INVALID seems harsh, it may scare away novice reporters.
>
> Do we want to make it easy to search for bugs stuck
>> Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
>
>There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
>INVALID with appropriate comment does the job.
INVALID seems harsh, it may scare away novice reporters.
Do we want to make it easy to search for bugs stuck
in a needmoreinfo kind of s
