> "Louis" == Louis Lenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Louis> Uwe Bonnes elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:
>> > "Peter" == Peter Beutner gmx.net> writes:
>>
Peter> Uwe Bonnes schrieb:
>> >>> "Peter" == Peter Beutner gmx.net> writes:
>> >>
Pet
Uwe Bonnes elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:
>
> > "Peter" == Peter Beutner gmx.net> writes:
>
> Peter> Uwe Bonnes schrieb:
> >>> "Peter" == Peter Beutner gmx.net> writes:
> >>
> Peter> Which means that '7.8912654773d210' is the same as
> Peter> '7.89126
Hello,
Peter Beutner schrieb:
> It doesn't parse 'd' or 'D' as exponent.
> Seems to be a "MS-only extension" to the standard :p
I would guess this comes from Fortran. Real values are printed with "e",
those with double precision printed with "d". And as one usually uses
double precision in Fortra
> "Peter" == Peter Beutner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Uwe Bonnes schrieb:
>>> "Peter" == Peter Beutner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Peter> Which means that '7.8912654773d210' is the same as
Peter> '7.8912654773e210'.
>> Running the test with native msvcrt
Uwe Bonnes schrieb:
>> "Peter" == Peter Beutner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Peter> Which means that '7.8912654773d210' is the same as
> Peter> '7.8912654773e210'.
>
> Running the test with native msvcrt doesn't give me 7.8912654773e210
> neither...
Using the test that Louis po
> "Peter" == Peter Beutner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Which means that '7.8912654773d210' is the same as
Peter> '7.8912654773e210'.
Running the test with native msvcrt doesn't give me 7.8912654773e210
neither...
Peter> But on linux we have(quoted from 'man strtod'):
Uwe Bonnes schrieb:
>> "Louis" == Louis Lenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Louis> Hi, i filed a bug ( bug 4337) and looks like there's a bug in
> Louis> atof. Is there a difference between linux' atof and msvcrt's one?
> Louis> Even following simple program (from msdn) yields
> "Louis" == Louis Lenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Louis> Hi, i filed a bug ( bug 4337) and looks like there's a bug in
Louis> atof. Is there a difference between linux' atof and msvcrt's one?
Louis> Even following simple program (from msdn) yields wrong results:
Louis> //
Hi, i filed a bug ( bug 4337) and looks like there's a
bug in atof. Is there a difference between linux' atof
and msvcrt's one? Even following simple program (from
msdn) yields wrong results:
// crt_atof.c
#include
#include
int main( void )
{
char *s; double x; int i
