Re: appdb needs to allow untested applications sometimes

2007-03-10 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
Søndag 11 mars 2007 00:51, skrev Dan Kegel: > I tried to add an appdb entry for FINView because it's > one of the applications required by the LiMux project, > and I'm trying to add links into the appdb for all apps listed on > http://wiki.winehq.org/LiMuxWineKeller . > It's an addon for a commerci

Re: appdb needs to allow untested applications sometimes

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Morgan
On 3/10/07, Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris Morgan wrote: > What would the purpose of having untested applications in the appdb > be? Users would search for the app and find that it shows up but then > find that it doens't work. At which point the application would qualify as be

Re: appdb needs to allow untested applications sometimes

2007-03-10 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Chris Morgan wrote: What would the purpose of having untested applications in the appdb be? Users would search for the app and find that it shows up but then find that it doens't work. At which point the application would qualify as been tested, no? Felix

Re: appdb needs to allow untested applications sometimes

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Morgan
What would the purpose of having untested applications in the appdb be? Users would search for the app and find that it shows up but then find that it doens't work. I'd prefer we simply left out untested applications to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high. Chris On 3/10/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL P

appdb needs to allow untested applications sometimes

2007-03-10 Thread Dan Kegel
I tried to add an appdb entry for FINView because it's one of the applications required by the LiMux project, and I'm trying to add links into the appdb for all apps listed on http://wiki.winehq.org/LiMuxWineKeller . It's an addon for a commercial product I don't have, so I couldn't test it. That