On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:06, Francois Gouget wrote:
> If it's something Alexandre uses to apply patches, then his requirement
> that it be usable from his desktop environement (Emacs) precludes a
> web-based system.
Not really. A web based system could provide an alternative interface that
allows fo
On 9/8/05, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/8/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 1) send a patch
> > 2) wait five days for a commit
> > 3) re-submit after five days has passed
> > 4) if the patch still isn't committed after two days ask why.
> >
>
> 7 days is a long
On 9/8/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) send a patch
> 2) wait five days for a commit
> 3) re-submit after five days has passed
> 4) if the patch still isn't committed after two days ask why.
>
7 days is a long time to wait for an explanation of why a patch wasn't
committed. I
On 9/8/05, Ivan Leo Puoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't need that, it's not much better than what we've got and isn't
> worth the effort, what is needed is something that Alexandre can use.
> New patches are "New", committed patched are "committed" and rejected
> patches are marked as "rej
Francois Gouget wrote:
Also it would not require disrupting Alexandre's routine or having him
do extra work. And the optional email to new submitters would be much
more friendly than having the patch go into a black hole without the
drawback of bothering old-time contributors.
I'm still in
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
What is a 'patch management system'?
If it's something Alexandre uses to apply patches, then his requirement
that it be usable from his desktop environement (Emacs) precludes a
web-ba
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
What is a 'patch management system'?
If it's something Alexandre uses to apply patches, then his
requirement that it be usable from his desktop environement (Emacs)
precludes a web-based system.
So what about something more l
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Hello, if you look at
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039837.html
you'll see there was a project at some point to make a decent patch
management system
What is a 'patch management system'?
If it's something Alexandre uses to
Hello, if you look at
http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039837.html
you'll see there was a project at some point to make a decent patch management system, but
apparently due to the complexity of it and Newman being constantly overloaded with work, it never
got anywhere,
