Re: alsa: device name

2005-06-13 Thread Robert Reif
Mike Hearn wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:20:20 -0400, Kevin Koltzau wrote: To be honest I didn't think it was correct either, but the current solution does not work correctly either so I figured I'd give it a shot. I have default overridden to pass through dmix/dsnoop, wine cannot access my

Re: alsa: device name

2005-06-13 Thread Mike Hearn
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:20:20 -0400, Kevin Koltzau wrote: > To be honest I didn't think it was correct either, but the current > solution does not work correctly either so I figured I'd give it a shot. > > I have default overridden to pass through dmix/dsnoop, wine cannot access > my card directly

Re: alsa: device name

2005-06-12 Thread Kevin Koltzau
On Sunday 12 June 2005 09:52 pm, Jeremy White wrote: > I don't think this is correct. Our job is to enumerate To be honest I didn't think it was correct either, but the current solution does not work correctly either so I figured I'd give it a shot. I have default overridden to pass through dmix

Re: alsa: device name

2005-06-12 Thread Jeremy White
Kevin, I don't think this is correct. Our job is to enumerate devices available to Wine; the 'default' device is generally card #0, device #0 on that card. A system may well have multiple card and multiple devices within a card; by setting this to 'default', you have prevented a meaningful scan