On 1/13/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm aware of that. We just have different approaches. Mine is from
> higher level functions to lower level, yours the other way round. Our
> approaches are not exclusive, we can simply meet in the middle (I know i
> took the easier way :-)).
James, I just saw your advpack patches.
Only patch 4 (* Add stubs for the file save/restore functions),
Makefile.in gets a merge conflict with mine first 1 (Move inf install
functions to install.c ). The rest applies fine (some offset warnings),
and builds without warning. Should I rediff again
James Hawkins wrote:
On 1/12/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ChangeLog:
Implement LaunchINFSection on top of DoInfInstall
I'm afraid this implementation isn't correct. DoInfInstall calls
SetupInstallFromInfSection which only concerns the Install section of
an INF file.
On 1/12/06, Markus Amsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ChangeLog:
> Implement LaunchINFSection on top of DoInfInstall
>
I'm afraid this implementation isn't correct. DoInfInstall calls
SetupInstallFromInfSection which only concerns the Install section of
an INF file. SetupInstallFromInfSection a
