On 27 Apr 2005 20:12:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We discussed this already, we don't want to do it that way (not to
> mention that keys can be named Machine or User inside the tree too, so
> your test is wrong anyway).
>
> Note that a lot of your new tests fail on X
James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static void load_keys( struct key *key,
> if ((read_next_line( &info ) != 1) ||
> strcmp( info.buffer, "WINE REGISTRY Version 2" ))
> {
> -set_error( STATUS_NOT_REGISTRY_FILE );
> +set_error( STAT
