On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> Now, can you tell me if the code seems ok to you? :-) It's my first
> submission to wine-patches and I note that it hasn't as yet elicited any
> response, either as a rejection or a commit.
This is usually good -- nobody has a big objection against it
Hi Dimitrie,
On September 9, 2003 10:49 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On September 9, 2003 10:34 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> > On the other hand, I *have* duplicated the interface
> > verbatim in terms of using exactly the same element names, the same
> > order of elements in the structures, etc.
>
On September 9, 2003 10:34 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> On the other hand, I *have* duplicated the interface
> verbatim in terms of using exactly the same element names, the same order
> of elements in the structures, etc.
This is fine, the element names, and order in the structure _are_
part of the
On September 9, 2003 10:14 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On September 9, 2003 08:40 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> > when adding missing functions and structure types to wine headers, to
> > what extent can we copy-n-paste structure definitions from the
> > documentation at msdn.microsoft.com web? IANAL
On September 9, 2003 08:40 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> when adding missing functions and structure types to wine headers, to
> what extent can we copy-n-paste structure definitions from the
> documentation at msdn.microsoft.com web? IANAL.
I'd say none -- don't copy-n-paste, express it (type it) you
Hi there,
Quick licensing/copyright question before I submit something I regret:
when adding missing functions and structure types to wine headers, to
what extent can we copy-n-paste structure definitions from the
documentation at msdn.microsoft.com web? IANAL.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
