Segin wrote:
> Mike Hearn wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:37:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> if wine is built with --disable-trace or --disable-debug, then using
>>> WINEDEBUG
>>> will accept the respective options without complaining and without actually
>>> showing any useful inform
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:37:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if wine is built with --disable-trace or --disable-debug, then using WINEDEBUG
will accept the respective options without complaining and without actually
showing any useful information
Why wou
Lionel Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So if I take your reasonning further, why even keep the '--disable-debug' /
> '--disable-trace' options in the configure script ?
In fact, I think removing them would be a good idea. People who
absolutely want to build a broken Wine can always define the
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:10:28 +0200, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> So if I take your reasonning further, why even keep the '--disable-debug' /
> '--disable-trace' options in the configure script ?
Well, I do wonder ... I guess for specialist scenarios some #define in the
source would be just as good.
>
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:55:11PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> So, I'll say it again - can somebody prove that Wine is faster without
> the tracing? I doubt it. And if there is a region where the debug
> channel test slows things down we can always add manual branch
> prediction hints or just take t
On 4/16/06, Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know the overhead of an dispatch table is bigger
> than a simple 'if (trace) {}', but this few (load, compare == two?)
> additional instruction still is noticeable in certain applications.
The overhead of a dispatch table is *much* bigger -
Mike Hearn wrote:
> Why would anybody build without tracing anyway? I would be *very*
> surprised if it led to any noticable/real world performance improvement.
Because of the exact same reason NVidia doesn't want to add yet another
dispatch table to linux's OpenGL libraries (as proposed by someon
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:37:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if wine is built with --disable-trace or --disable-debug, then using
> WINEDEBUG
> will accept the respective options without complaining and without actually
> showing any useful information
Why would anybody build without tracing any
