> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Mike M told me on IRC that this matter has come up before, but I have
> > not been able to find it in the archives. It seems Wine has been
> > generating lots of zombie processes when it's not 100% cleanly killed.
Patrick Spinler wrote:
I haven't raised a bug report anywhere because, well, the kernel guys
would say 'it's redhat's kernel, talk to them', and the wine guys
would say 'it's crossover's wine, talk to them'.
Actually, the kernel guys are more likely to say "it's a redhat kernel,
does it also hap
even with the vendor kernel and wine, perhaps the
knowedge might be useful.
Thanks,
-- Pat
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
Mike M told me on IRC that this matter has come up before, but I have
not been able to find it in the archives. It seems Wine has been
generating lots of zombie processes whe
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > It seems Wine has been > generating lots of zombie processes
> when it's not 100% cleanly killed. I > have also seen the system hold
> a socket created from a wine process in > "ESTABL
Robert Shearman wrote:
I've experienced the same thing on a perfectly clean kernel (I think
2.6.5-mm1), but I assumed it was because we were messing around with
signals. If I can reproduce the problem I will report it, although Mike
McCormack seems to have had quite a bit of contact already with t
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Mike M told me on IRC that this matter has come up before, but I have
> not been able to find it in the archives. It seems Wine has been
> generating lots of zombie processes when it's not 100% cleanly killed. I
> have also seen the syste
Hi all,
Mike M told me on IRC that this matter has come up before, but I have
not been able to find it in the archives. It seems Wine has been
generating lots of zombie processes when it's not 100% cleanly killed. I
have also seen the system hold a socket created from a wine proce
