Thereis one more thing, i still see a minimized window just above the
panel, i think that should go. Its in Gnome i dont know how its in
other WM's
bye,
Vijay
On 11/10/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 11:32 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > I have to Julliard
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 11:32 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> I have to Julliard regarding this, he still thinks that there should
> be some more work to be done on it. He did not mentioned what work is
> to be done.
Yeah, I have as well. He's yet to return my e-mail on that one.
> Well you shoul
I have to Julliard regarding this, he still thinks that there should
be some more work to be done on it. He did not mentioned what work is
to be done.
Well you should also see that if any one closes a systray application,
any wine process should not be present after closing the app.
Please check wi
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:26 +0530, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> I have tested googletalk with the patch of yours, i am attaching the
> screenshot of it.
> whenever i ve closed an googletalk instance its present on the screen
> (in the picture i have labelled it as zombie), in ps -ef its not
> killin
Ok I created some new patches. (I decided to break it up this time. They
can be applied in any order) Thanks for helping test this! :) If you
have any feedback, please let me know...If they work out OK I will post
them to wine-patches again.
James
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:07 +0530, Vijay Kiran Ka
could you please send a new patch as per latest cvs or 0.9
I would like to test this patch.
with 0.9 its not applying properly
Thanks,
Vijay
On 10/27/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 14:33 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid it's too big a change t
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 14:33 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I'm afraid it's too big a change to get in at this point. Besides,
> there are still problems with that patch.
Now that 0.9 is released and the freeze is over, can you please tell me
what the problems are so I can fix them?
Thanks,
J
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 15:51 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:33:02PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1301 is in Wine 0.9 blocker list.
> > > I guess this patch should go
I'm afraid it's too big a change to get in at this point. Besides,
> there are still problems with that patch.
Which problems are you referring to? It's true that there are some
issues with it, but those (at least in my testing anyway) are limited to
Gnome. With other desktops, such as XFce and Ice
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:33:02PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1301 is in Wine 0.9 blocker list.
> > I guess this patch should go in before Wine 0.9 is released. (same goes
> > for finalizing the do
Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1301 is in Wine 0.9 blocker list.
> I guess this patch should go in before Wine 0.9 is released. (same goes
> for finalizing the docs); isn't it ?
I'm afraid it's too big a change to get in at this point. Besides,
On 10/18/05, Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1301 is in Wine 0.9 blocker list.
> I guess this patch should go in before Wine 0.9 is released. (same goes
> for finalizing the docs); isn't it ?
>
If you look at this as a bug, then it's possible Al
Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 15:16 -0500, James Hawkins a écrit :
> On 10/18/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No problem. It's always possible that Alexandre might allow it, but
> you'd have to ask him specifically whether it is acceptable at this
> point. The freeze will end when
On 10/18/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks. I wasn't sure that this would be affected by the freeze,
> since this functionality is on the task list for 0.9. I thought I would
> try to get it in since it's a major usability problem for anyone who
> uses anything other than
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 15:05 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> On 10/18/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anything wrong with this patch? (Resent version)
> >
>
> We're in a feature freeze right now till 0.9 is released. I would try
> submitting again after that point.
Ok, thanks. I was
On 10/18/05, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anything wrong with this patch? (Resent version)
>
We're in a feature freeze right now till 0.9 is released. I would try
submitting again after that point.
--
James Hawkins
Anything wrong with this patch? (Resent version)
James Liggett
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:07 -0700, James Liggett wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch implements XEmbed system tray support for recent non-KDE
> desktops. This is a modified version of a patch originally submitted by
> Rob Shearman, <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 12:07 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Also what's
> the reason for having an XSync here?
The XSync call is in the example on freedeskotop.org for showing how to
send client messages
(http://standards.freedesktop.org/systemtray-spec/systemtray-spec-0.2.html#messages)
uses
Adding the locking fixes the problem about icons not docking properly
that I described in one of my posts yesterday. It's much better now.
James
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 13:58 -0500, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> >Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>+
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've added the locking. The XSync is needed because without it the
> systray window ends up with a width of 1. I don't understand why this is
> happening. What debug channels would be good to turn on to investigate this?
Probably +event and check fo
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
+ev.xclient.type = ClientMessage;
+ev.xclient.window = systray_window;
+ev.xclient.message_type = x11drv_atom(_NET_SYSTEM_TRAY_OPCODE);
+ev.xclient.format = 32;
+ev.xclient.data.l[0]
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +ev.xclient.type = ClientMessage;
> +ev.xclient.window = systray_window;
> +ev.xclient.message_type = x11drv_atom(_NET_SYSTEM_TRAY_OPCODE);
> +ev.xclient.format = 32;
> +ev.xclient.data.l[0] = CurrentTime;
> +
Aside from the bugs I've mentioned before, it doesn't seem that the
implementation of this works quite right. This patch should address the
bugs in dlls/shell32/systray.c, not just the docking. I've fixed most
things, but there is still one big problem. There's a window cleanup
problem where the fi
Robert Shearman wrote:
Hi,
This patch allows new non-KDE systems to display notification area
icons for Win32 apps in the window manager's system tray, instead of
in a 16x16 top-level window.
Changelog:
Support XEmbed protocol for system tray windows.
Anything wrong with this patch?
--
Robert Shearman wrote:
Hi,
This patch allows new non-KDE systems to display notification area
icons for Win32 apps in the window manager's system tray, instead of
in a 16x16 top-level window.
Changelog:
Support XEmbed protocol for system tray windows.
Sorry, I forgot to credit Mike Hearn
25 matches
Mail list logo
