Re: Write-strings warning: the endgame

2006-08-25 Thread Andrew Talbot
Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > I committed the patches and enabled the warning. Thanks for your work! > Thanks, Alexandre. I'm very grateful to you for your kind help and encouragement, too. -- Andy.

Re: Write-strings warning: the endgame

2006-08-25 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Currently, there are just eight write-strings violations remaining in the > codebase: six in mshtml/nsembed.c (lines 271, 353, 356, 367, 432 and 1237), > one in mshtml/nsservice.c (line 454) and one in widl/parser.c (line 848). > So I would advocate that

Re: Write-strings warning: the endgame

2006-08-24 Thread James Hawkins
On 8/24/06, Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently, there are just eight write-strings violations remaining in the codebase: six in mshtml/nsembed.c (lines 271, 353, 356, 367, 432 and 1237), one in mshtml/nsservice.c (line 454) and one in widl/parser.c (line 848). So I would advocate

Write-strings warning: the endgame

2006-08-24 Thread Andrew Talbot
Currently, there are just eight write-strings violations remaining in the codebase: six in mshtml/nsembed.c (lines 271, 353, 356, 367, 432 and 1237), one in mshtml/nsservice.c (line 454) and one in widl/parser.c (line 848). So I would advocate that the -Wwrite-strings switch could now be turned on.