Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26794
Your paranoid android
On 08/18/13 13:44, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26726
Your paranoid android
The main scenario I'm
picturing is if someday we wanted to combine data
from different parts of the website (for example,
bugzilla queries along with related git patches).
That may be overdoing things, but I feel like
those cross-connections are one of the main things
that could really help Win
ragin.
On 22.09.2012 7:32, Kyle Auble wrote:
After working on the wiki for a while, I finally wanted to ask about
possibly moving WineHQ to a CMS or web framework.
First off, while there are a couple of mentions on the wiki and mailing
lists, is there still much interest in doing this? If there i
After working on the wiki for a while, I finally wanted to ask about
possibly moving WineHQ to a CMS or web framework.
First off, while there are a couple of mentions on the wiki and mailing
lists, is there still much interest in doing this? If there is, I think
the second question is which kind
hen converting the pages to Mediawiki syntax.
Well, let`s try.
However, I believe all the content on WineHQ & the wiki are under the
LGPL so if you really wanted to, I'd think you could try testing a
mirror of the site as a proof of concept, running Cherokee on your own
computer.
Well,
hnology
comes out, I wouldn't want to switch the actual http server out until
it starts having noticeable problems, or in the distant future once
higher priorities have been taken care of.
For me, WineHQ itself seems to be really fast, and as we were
discussing earlier in the thread, the wiki is
On 08/28/2012 04:47 AM, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
Well, in addition, how do you think, is any necessarity there to move
wine site and wiki from Apache to Cherokee?
Not going to happen anytime in the near future. I won't say never however.
-N
Finally I got an answer from Jeremy White, wine site admin:
Hi Oleg,
On 08/26/2012 08:21 AM, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
Good time of a day, Jeremy.
I write to you as to a WEB-administrator of WineHQ server about some
ideas of site functionality improvement:
1. How is about moving WineHQ Wiki
uble :
>> Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:44, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
>>> When I edited pages in the WineHQ Wiki, I notised, its markup lankuage
>>> isn`t so good as MediaWiki`s one. How do you think about moving the Wiki
>>> into MediaWiki engine? Besides, moving each language se
2012/8/26 André Hentschel :
> Am 26.08.2012 07:16, schrieb Cheer Xiao:
>> 2012/8/26 Cheer Xiao :
>>> ... snip ...
>>> Try out MoinMoin 2.0 at this minefield[5]. The last Summer of Code[6]
>>> saw a few interesting enhancements like greatly improved themes,
>>> support for blog and ticket system (di
Am 26.08.2012 07:16, schrieb Cheer Xiao:
> 2012/8/26 Cheer Xiao :
>> ... snip ...
>> Try out MoinMoin 2.0 at this minefield[5]. The last Summer of Code[6]
>> saw a few interesting enhancements like greatly improved themes,
>> support for blog and ticket system (disclaimer: ticket system is my
>> pr
2012/8/26 Cheer Xiao :
> ... snip ...
> Try out MoinMoin 2.0 at this minefield[5]. The last Summer of Code[6]
> saw a few interesting enhancements like greatly improved themes,
> support for blog and ticket system (disclaimer: ticket system is my
> project), but the test site has not been updated y
Hi all,
I'm a MoinMoin contributor, one of MoinMoin's participating students
in this year's Summer of Code.
2012/8/26 Kyle Auble :
> Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:44, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
>> When I edited pages in the WineHQ Wiki, I notised, its markup lankuage
>> isn`t so g
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:44, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
> When I edited pages in the WineHQ Wiki, I notised, its markup lankuage
> isn`t so good as MediaWiki`s one. How do you think about moving the Wiki
> into MediaWiki engine? Besides, moving each language section of the Wiki
> into separat
Hi to all!
When I edited pages in the WineHQ Wiki, I notised, its markup lankuage
isn`t so good as MediaWiki`s one. How do you think about moving the Wiki
into MediaWiki engine? Besides, moving each language section of the Wiki
into separated subdomain (like in Wikipedia) would be a good idea
> Or better yet, force automatic redirect to https, with
> Strict-Transport-Security:
> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/08/firefox-4-http-strict-transport-security-force-https/
>
> If winehq can't get more ips for every subdomain (ssl sucks), would the
> solution be moving it to https://winehq.org/{bugs,appdb,test,source} ?
Or a wildcard SSL cert for *.winehq.org.
Ciao, Marcus
get the certificate for
test.winehq.org , otherwise you could use the firefox https anywhere to force
https on.
Or better yet, force automatic redirect to https, with
Strict-Transport-Security:
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/08/firefox-4-http-strict-transport-security-force-https/
If winehq ca
On 10/11/2011 09:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
"Nothing Is Invulnerable"
So, now or later, your system will be compromised.
The only thing you have to do is to be prepared to face an incident and
of course s
On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> 2011/10/11 Josh Juran
>
>> To clarify, your browser sends your password to bugzilla in cleartext, since
>> HTTPS isn't an option.
>
> Shouldn't it be possible to modify the login environment so that a salted
> hash of the password is
2011/10/11 Josh Juran
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
> >
> >> Since bugzilla passwords were sent in cleartext anyway, I sincerely hope
> none of them were otherwise valuable. (Remember FireSheep?)
> >
> > Wait,
2011/10/11 Josh Juran :
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
>>
>>> Since bugzilla passwords were sent in cleartext anyway, I sincerely hope
>>> none of them were otherwise valuable. (Remember FireSheep?)
>>
>> Wait, w
On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
>
>> Since bugzilla passwords were sent in cleartext anyway, I sincerely hope
>> none of them were otherwise valuable. (Remember FireSheep?)
>
> Wait, what? Bugzilla sends passwords i
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, the attackers were able to download the full login
> > database for both the appdb and bugzilla. This means that they have all
> > of those emails, as well as the passwords
> Almost 2 years ago I have sent you an email privately about a security
> hole with the database. To be exactly, the date of the email is Wed,
> Jul 29, 2009, 12:00 AM (GMT +02:00). I guess that's probably the same
> trick the bad guys have used...
Hmm. I can't find any such email in my archives
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
>
> What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
> access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly how they
On Oct 11, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
> access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly how they obtained
> access; it was either by compromising an admins credentials, or by
> exploiting an unpatched vulner
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
>
Hi,
one question. I'm not worried about my current account, but I had an old
email with an old password recorded in my keychain store. I
Oct 11, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
>>
>> What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
>> access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly
emy White wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
>>
>> What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
>> access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly how they obtained
>>
Hey everyone,
On 10/11/2011 09:13 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
>
> What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
> access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly
at there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
>
> What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
> access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly how they obtained
> access; it was either by compromising an admins credentials, or by
> exploiting
Hi,
I am sad to say that there was a compromise of the WineHQ database system.
What we know at this point that someone was able to obtain unauthorized
access to the phpmyadmin utility. We do not exactly how they obtained
access; it was either by compromising an admins credentials, or by
OK, the maintenance is complete. Let me know if you notice any odd
errors with our various websites. Everything but the Wiki, as that is
hosted elsewhere.
-Newman
On 08/30/2011 01:07 PM, Jeremy Newman wrote:
We will be performing upgrades and maintenance to the WineHQ.org server
starting at 1
We will be performing upgrades and maintenance to the WineHQ.org server
starting at 1800 CDT on Wednesday August 31st.
This process will take the server off-line for about an hour. The
Websites (www,appdb,forums), and Mailing lists, and Git will be off-line
during this period.
-Newman
Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>as bug #19762 is open for some time now, fully bisected, the solution applied
>for
>several versions in my Debian packages ([0]) without reports about breakage, I
>hearby propose the reversion of commit 67631163.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19762#c21
That commit
On 29 April 2011 12:29, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> several versions in my Debian packages ([0]) without reports about breakage, I
> hearby propose the reversion of commit 67631163. Wylda tried to reach the
I don't think reverting that commit is the right thing to do, it's
just going to break somethin
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Are you going to encourage packagers to include whatever patches
> they deem to be "an important feature" for the users, and still claim
> that provide an official Wine binary package?
There's a middle ground: ship both vanilla and patched wine, and make
vanilla the defau
[Please do not exclude wine-devel when repying]
Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> > That's precisely my point. How many users are prepared to compile Wine
> > from source when they report a bug with such a Wine build, and
> > somebody
> > asks them to either use a package without custom patches or compi
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> > Once again, packages with custom patches can't be supported through WineHQ
> > bugzilla for obvious reasons. If the packager knows what he/she is dooing by
> I disagree with this statement. Each distribution modifies the upstream
> Wine
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:15 +0100, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> I disagree with this statement. Each distribution modifies the
> upstream
> Wine in one way or the other. And a blanket "Screw you, use upstream
> Wine if you want support" doesn't cut it. The distributions are for us
> the main consumer
> Wine is big and those patches cover only a small aspect. E.g. if a
> distribution reports a crypt32 bug it doesn't matter if they use
> winepulse.drv or not, right? I'm just opposing the blanket "reject all"
> distribution Wine binaries created from modified source. For the Wine
> aspects modifie
Hello Juan,
Juan Lang wrote:
>>> Once again, packages with custom patches can't be supported through WineHQ
>>> bugzilla for obvious reasons. If the packager knows what he/she is dooing by
>> I disagree with this statement. Each distribution modifies the upstream
&g
Hello Michael,
>> Once again, packages with custom patches can't be supported through WineHQ
>> bugzilla for obvious reasons. If the packager knows what he/she is dooing by
> I disagree with this statement. Each distribution modifies the upstream
> Wine in one way or t
> Using the term 'prepackaged binary' doesn't make the package suddenly valid
> for WineHQ bugzilla, since it clearly contains not supported patches. Same
> applies for instance to crossover, ies4linux, wineskin or any other.
>
>> For the Fedora users pulse support
Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> could you please stop arguing about the validity of the bug. What you
> are stating in comment 6 is really not exclusive. The Fedora wine
> packages are in fact 'prepackaged binary'.
Using the term 'prepackaged binary' doesn't make the
2010/9/15 Frédéric Delanoy :
> A STFW for wine faq gives as first result this page
>
> http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index (old version of the FAQ)
>
> instead of
>
> http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ (linked from home > support)
>
> The former contains some outdated information. Shouldn't it b
A STFW for wine faq gives as first result this page
http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index (old version of the FAQ)
instead of
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ (linked from home > support)
The former contains some outdated information. Shouldn't it be
suppressed (after a check to see if does
2010/5/30 André Hentschel :
> Am 30.05.2010 00:16, schrieb Scott Ritchie:
>> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/powered-by.html
>>
>> Mozilla has a small campaign to mention projects that depend on them in
>> various fashions. I think it'd be neat to get listed there on that page.
>>
>> Mozilla in tu
Am 30.05.2010 00:16, schrieb Scott Ritchie:
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/powered-by.html
>
> Mozilla has a small campaign to mention projects that depend on them in
> various fashions. I think it'd be neat to get listed there on that page.
>
> Mozilla in turn would like us to mention Mozill
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/powered-by.html
Mozilla has a small campaign to mention projects that depend on them in
various fashions. I think it'd be neat to get listed there on that page.
Mozilla in turn would like us to mention Mozilla somewhere on our site.
This seems like something we s
On 19.05.2010 17:03, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> I was doing some housecleaning work looking at the WineHQ website, and I
> realized we still have an awful lot of flat, wide text on the About
> page. This is the perfect place to collapse it into a column and fill
> the right side of the sc
On 19 May 2010 16:03, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> I was doing some housecleaning work looking at the WineHQ website, and I
> realized we still have an awful lot of flat, wide text on the About
> page. This is the perfect place to collapse it into a column and fill
> the right side of the
I was doing some housecleaning work looking at the WineHQ website, and I
realized we still have an awful lot of flat, wide text on the About
page. This is the perfect place to collapse it into a column and fill
the right side of the screen with an image.
But...what image?
Thanks,
Scott Ritchie
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
+AppDB / BugZilla
+BugZilla Changes:
+
+
+
+
+
+ Category
+
+
+Total Bugs Last Issue
+
+
+ Total Bugs This Issue
+
+
+ Net Change
+
+
+
+
+
+ UNCONFIRMED
+
+
+ 2795
+
+
+ 2821
+
+
+
+ +26
+
+
+
+
+
+ NEW
+
+
+ 2677
+
+
+ 2683
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 15:58, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig
wrote:
> BTW I've done some cabinet.dll stuff some years ago.
> Can anybody give me a hint to some easy-to-understand data compression
> documentation?
> I want to complete the cabinet.dll archive creation compression,
> if I get the require
correct from address
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gert van den Berg
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 15:58, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig
wrote:
> BTW I've done some cabinet.dll stuff some years ago.
> Can anybody give me a hint to some easy-to-understand data compression
> documentation?
>
Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig wrote:
>
> Hi, I've donated some bucks to winehq by PayPal and want to spend more...
> Can I decide for which things will be spend?
> When donating money, how much of it will go to PayPal?
> Is there a better way than using PayPal (by the donate
> BTW I've done some cabinet.dll stuff some years ago.
> Can anybody give me a hint to some easy-to-understand data compression
> documentation?
You mean in general?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Compression
Should have enough links for the specific sub-topics.
Regards,
Wolfram
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig <
gjwucherpfen...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hi, I've donated some bucks to winehq by PayPal and want to spend more...
>
:)
> Can I decide for which things will be spend?
>
The money goes to support future Wine C
Hi, I've donated some bucks to winehq by PayPal and want to spend more...
Can I decide for which things will be spend?
When donating money, how much of it will go to PayPal?
Is there a better way than using PayPal (by the donate link of the
winehq front-page)?
BTW I've done some c
WineHQ.org will be going off-line today starting at 14:30 US Central time.
At this time we are performing hardware upgrades and maintenance. The
system will be off-line from 20 minutes up to an hour.
Services Affected:
* WineHQ.org website
* Bugzilla
* Forums
* AppDB
* mailing lists
* GIT and
Reece Dunn wrote:
2009/9/10 David Gerard :
2009/9/10 Jeremy Newman :
The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to convert
the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in while still
in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C validation. I a
2009/9/10 David Gerard :
> 2009/9/10 Jeremy Newman :
>
>> The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to convert
>> the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in while still
>> in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C validation. I am
>> still
2009/9/10 Jeremy Newman :
> The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to convert
> the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in while still
> in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C validation. I am
> still willing to live with non-valid
The reason I left the XHTML markup in was eventually the goal was to
convert the entire website to XHTML. The only issue with leaving them in
while still in HTML4/Transitional is that the pages do not pass W3C
validation. I am still willing to live with non-valid working HTML to
save some work
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Roderick
Colenbrander wrote:
> I would be willing to assist with any Mac issues as I would need a
> LGPL'ed version of Wine on OSX myself. I'm assisting bringing a
> university program to Linux/Mac using Wine and for that I need decent
> Mac support. Darwine set som
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
>
> BTW, it would be nice if MacOS users could comment on
> a) my comment #4 to bug #17674 above or on
> b) my patch
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-July/075290.html
> It was not included in Wine-1.1.25 perhaps because AJ awaits
> confirma
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
> James McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Something that I do have to point out is that freetype, a very
>>
> important
>
>> library for Wine is not shipped with XCode nor MacOSX. We have to
>> include it.
>>
>
> Huh? On my 10.5.7 Leopard system, Wine was
>James McKenzie wrote:
>>Something that I do have to point out is that freetype, a very
>important
>>library for Wine is not shipped with XCode nor MacOSX. We have to
>>include it.
>
>Huh? On my 10.5.7 Leopard system, Wine was able to find FreeType -- with
>LD_LIBRARY_PATH guidance. And I have no
James McKenzie wrote:
>Something that I do have to point out is that freetype, a very
important
>library for Wine is not shipped with XCode nor MacOSX. We have to
>include it.
Huh? On my 10.5.7 Leopard system, Wine was able to find FreeType -- with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH guidance. And I have nothing bu
Mike Kronenberg wrote:
>
> On 26.06.2009, at 16:51, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>> "Emmanuel Maillard" wrote:
>>
>>> Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not
>>> GPL but LGPL.
>>> Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we
>>> never change Wine licensi
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Mike Kronenberg <
mike.kronenb...@kronenberg.org> wrote:
> OS X
> My main concern is to have usable builds. Ie, usable without the need of a
> terminal. People on OS X don't care about how stuff works, it just has to
> work.
>
> Vanilla build
> I totally agree that
On 29 Jun 2009, at 14:10, > wrote:
If there were a plain vanilla wine built on OS X
IMHO, Mac Users can expect from a binary distribution something Mac-
like, e.g. some kind of GUI.
Another OSS project I've worked on for over a decade used to embed
NeXtStep
specific GUI source code. Th
>If there were a plain vanilla wine built on OS X
IMHO, Mac Users can expect from a binary distribution something Mac-like, e.g.
some kind of GUI.
Another OSS project I've worked on for over a decade used to embed NeXtStep
specific GUI source code. There was no GUI for any other UNIX derivative.
On 26.06.2009, at 16:51, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Emmanuel Maillard" wrote:
Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not
GPL but LGPL.
Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we
never change Wine licensing
in Darwine.
Darwine site claims that
packages for OS X and a
link on the wiki would have been much appreciated.
In my opinion WineHQ Wiki is not an appropriate place for that.
It would look like WineHQ somehow suggests to download and use
that package, while that's not true. Darwine builds fall in the
same category as WineX,
big hack and shouldn't be linked to from
>>> our website. Tweaking themes or icons is fine. Actually we just need
>>> to refine our .msstyles support and then icon can just be part of a
>>> theme like they are on Windows.
>
>> I wouldn't call the DIB engine a
emes or icons is fine. Actually we just need
>> to refine our .msstyles support and then icon can just be part of a
>> theme like they are on Windows.
> I wouldn't call the DIB engine a hack. A large piece of code not
> accepted into official WineHQ, sure.
Even the author considers it a *bit* of one :-)
- d.
o refine our .msstyles support and then icon can just be part of a
> theme like they are on Windows.
I wouldn't call the DIB engine a hack. A large piece of code not
accepted into official WineHQ, sure.
--
-Austin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Roderick
Colenbrander wrote:
> If they ship hacks like the DIB engine then we won't accept bug
> reports for it as it a real big hack and shouldn't be linked to from
> our website. Tweaking themes or icons is fine. Actually we just need
> to refine our .msstyles sup
t;> Wine, plain and simple.
>
> I have a Mac that I've given Austin English access to for his Wine
> hacking needs and he's got a set of scripts for building and running
> Winetests. I am happy to provide binaries of stock Winehq but I don't
> see any reason why we can&#
h access to for his Wine
hacking needs and he's got a set of scripts for building and running
Winetests. I am happy to provide binaries of stock Winehq but I don't
see any reason why we can't link to Mike's Darwine build. Maybe he's
not had time to cleanup his site, document
"Emmanuel Maillard" wrote:
Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not GPL
but LGPL.
Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we never
change Wine licensing
in Darwine.
Darwine site claims that it's under GPL. In any case different name means
a di
Hi,
Darwine tools WineHelper and create_darwine_distrib script are not GPL
but LGPL.
Don't know for Mike Kronenberg patches or other stuffs, but we never
change Wine licensing
in Darwine.
Emmanuel
Le 26 juin 09 à 05:19, Dmitry Timoshkov a écrit :
wrote:
Yesterday I edited http://wiki.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Austin English wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:56 AM, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less
>> outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all
>> references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine
ch
appreciated.
In my opinion WineHQ Wiki is not an appropriate place for that.
It would look like WineHQ somehow suggests to download and use
that package, while that's not true. Darwine builds fall in the
same category as WineX, and other Wine forks with not clear or
conflicting licen
are those that are simple compiles of the official WineHQ
git source, with required dependencies, but otherwise unmodified
source. Mike Kronenberg's package may be close to this, but as long
as it has any patches applied that are not in mainline, it doesn't
qualify, at least in my opinion
wrote:
Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less
outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed
all references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at
http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
The explanation is here:
http://wiki.winehq.org
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:56 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less
> outdated than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all
> references to Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at
> http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
>
; This is unappropriate censorship to me.
I can't speculate about Dmitry's motivations, but there is one simple
rationale I can think of for such an action: the Wine project does
not generally provide support for binary distributions. The only
exceptions are those that are simple compiles
Hi,
Yesterday I edited http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/FAQs to be much less outdated
than before and today I found that Dmitry Timoshkov removed all references to
Mike Kronenberg's Wine binary distribution at http://www.kronenberg.org/darwine/
This is unappropriate censorship to me.
http://wiki.w
It is in sync with the rest of the site(s). It is now using 10pt font
instead of 10px.
Fix it for someone, break it for someone else.
-Newman
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Jeremy Newman wrote:
>> I have committed my work for the WineHQ redesign. I've also updated the
>>
Jeremy Newman wrote:
> I have committed my work for the WineHQ redesign. I've also updated the
> AppDB and Bugzilla codebases with the new theme.
The font on bugzilla looks 2x bigger then it's used to. The strange part
it's only the bugzilla part that looks big. Menus are fine.
Vitaliy
On Monday 08 December 2008 22:49:15 Jeremy Newman wrote:
> I tweaked the font sizes a bit.
>
> -Newman
>
> Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > On Monday 08 December 2008 20:42:30 Jeremy Newman wrote:
> >> This is because of the "font-size: medium". IE Renders medium text
> >> much larger than Gecko and Webki
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Jeremy Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I have committed my work for the WineHQ redesign. I've also updated the
> AppDB and Bugzilla codebases with the new theme.
>
By the way, the new site looks great on a Blackberry using Opera Mini
Reece Dunn wrote:
> Some issues:
> 1. The wiki is not using the new layout.
Dimi is currently updating the Wiki.
> 2. In the forums top-level page, the navigation is displayed in one
> big list that pushes the forum content to the bottom of the screen.
> 3. The WineHQ link on
eremy Newman pisze:
> Do you have javascript disabled? I have a javascript workaround that
> makes PNGs load the alpha correctly under IE6.
>
> -Newman
>
> Tomasz Sałaciński wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been looking at the new WineHQ webiste and it looks reall
2008/12/9 Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Some issues:
> 1. The wiki is not using the new layout.
> 2. In the forums top-level page, the navigation is displayed in one
> big list that pushes the forum content to the bottom of the screen.
> 3. The WineHQ link on the foru
1 - 100 of 447 matches
Mail list logo
