Ingo Molnar wrote:
It would be nice if someone with a proper Wine test-setup could check
whether _negative_ renicing of highprio Windows threads solves the
scheduling problems. In fact you could even try to map Windows
priorities (16 levels available to nonprivileged users?) to the nice
range of -7
* Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted a patch for SCHED_BOUND to do just such a thing to the linux
> kernel mailing list 2 months ago. Noone responded so I didn't pursue
> it.
another option would be to allow a certain range of negative nice levels
for unprivileged users.
It would
Jeremy White wrote:
Hi all,
This is simply a renaming and reorganizing post; Dimi wacked me
with a clue bat, and I am now looping Ingo Molnar into this
conversation (and I am doing it at great haste since he
made noises about helping ).
The thread started here:
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/win
Hi all,
This is simply a renaming and reorganizing post; Dimi wacked me
with a clue bat, and I am now looping Ingo Molnar into this
conversation (and I am doing it at great haste since he
made noises about helping ).
The thread started here:
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2004/08/0306
