On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:19, Chuck Hall wrote:
> > Chuck Hall wrote:
> >> Well it looks good. I did get a few failures on the patching, but it
> >> wnet
> >> through 'make depend' without a problem.
> >>
> >> Now I run into the problem in kthread.c:
> >> sed -e 's,@bindir\@,/usr/local/bin,g' -e
ven't heard from you for a few days.
How did you go in trying to compile wine on sparc?
I have been following this thread and trying to compile wine on sparc myself.
I am on Solaris 9 and have ran into some similar problem you had.
I finally got wine compiled and installed (with some librarie
> Chuck Hall wrote:
>> Started to go through this and found something intresting. lwp.h does
>> exist and is found, so HAVE_SYS_LWP_H is defined. The test for
>> _lwp_create fails. Looking a bit deeper I found that the lwp.h for
>> Solaris 9 is different from the one in Solaris 10 (which is what
Chuck Hall wrote:
Started to go through this and found something intresting. lwp.h does
exist and is found, so HAVE_SYS_LWP_H is defined. The test for
_lwp_create fails. Looking a bit deeper I found that the lwp.h for
Solaris 9 is different from the one in Solaris 10 (which is what I am
using)
> Chuck Hall wrote:
>> Well it looks good. I did get a few failures on the patching, but it
>> wnet
>> through 'make depend' without a problem.
>>
>> Now I run into the problem in kthread.c:
>> sed -e 's,@bindir\@,/usr/local/bin,g' -e
>> 's,@dlldir\@,/usr/local/lib/wine,g' -e 's,@PACKAGE_STRING\@,
As an end-user, I'd find any screenshots of notepad
running amazing. :) Got any?
Hiji
--- Eric Frias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chuck Hall wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2005, Eric Frias wrote:
> >>I'll be trying to get the current wine running
> this afternoon; I'll post
> >>something when it's
Chuck Hall wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Eric Frias wrote:
I'll be trying to get the current wine running this afternoon; I'll post
something when it's working.
I look forward to hearing how this turns out.
It actually went more smoothly than I expected. I've attached a patch
with the minima
ive linker seems to be the
> preferred configuration. I've been meaning to try building with the
> native linker sometime, but I haven't gotten around to it since gnu's
> linker seems to work so well.
I will try it using the native ld and see what happens.
> > You men
hered on the gcc
mailing list, using gcc and gas with the native linker seems to be the
preferred configuration. I've been meaning to try building with the
native linker sometime, but I haven't gotten around to it since gnu's
linker seems to work so well.
You mentioned that you
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 05:56, Eric Frias wrote:
> Chuck Hall wrote:
> > I should have mentioned what tools I'm using and the why I sent the
> > patch. I am using the native Sun assembler and linker. The Sun assembler
> > does not understand the .previous so that is the reason for the patch.
>
> Ma
Chuck Hall wrote:
Guess that means I need to learn autoconf and related stuff.
I just want to make sure you understood that when Eric Frias wrote:
... Winelib only, of course, none of the emulation stuff is going to
work on Sparc.
What that means is that you won't be able to run Windows p
uccess with the combination of
> binutils-2.14 and gcc-3.4.2.
When was the last time the Wine README was updated? Using the GNU
toolchain I get a few more warning messages during 'make depend' but it
does work. Gcc, gas, and gld need to be from the GNU toolchain, the rest
seems to work
Chuck Hall wrote:
I should have mentioned what tools I'm using and the why I sent the patch.
I am using the native Sun assembler and linker. The Sun assembler does
not understand the .previous so that is the reason for the patch.
Makes sense. If you get the Sun assembler to work, we should
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Eric Frias wrote:
> Chuck Hall wrote:
> > I have heard that people are using Wine on Solaris. I would like to know
> > if they are using Wine on the SPARC version or the x86 version of Solaris?
>
> I'm using it on the Sparc version, with Solaris 7 and 8. Winelib only,
> of
Chuck Hall wrote:
I have heard that people are using Wine on Solaris. I would like to know
if they are using Wine on the SPARC version or the x86 version of Solaris?
I'm using it on the Sparc version, with Solaris 7 and 8. Winelib only,
of course, none of the emulation stuff is going to work
Greetings,
I have heard that people are using Wine on Solaris. I would like to know
if they are using Wine on the SPARC version or the x86 version of Solaris?
There does seem to be code within Wine to have it run on SPARC machines,
but it currently does not seem to compile, at least on the Solar
16 matches
Mail list logo
