-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ove Kaaven wrote:
| Benjamin M. Schwartz skrev:
|> Bug #2 suggests that it may be possible to solve this problem using
|> dynamically generated symlinks. I will try that.
|
| The big reason .wine has to be owned by the right user is that the
| win
Benjamin M. Schwartz skrev:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ove Kaaven wrote:
> | Benjamin M. Schwartz skrev:
> |> I'm particularly surprised because I cannot imagine any reasonable
> |> scenario in which allowing non-root users to run in .wine/ directories
> |> that they do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ove Kaaven wrote:
| Benjamin M. Schwartz skrev:
|> I'm particularly surprised because I cannot imagine any reasonable
|> scenario in which allowing non-root users to run in .wine/ directories
|> that they do not own is a security risk. There is no pri
Benjamin M. Schwartz skrev:
> I'm particularly surprised because I cannot imagine any reasonable
> scenario in which allowing non-root users to run in .wine/ directories
> that they do not own is a security risk. There is no privilege escalation
> here; the non-root user is still required by the k
On Saturday April 12 2008 04:54:44 Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> I need the ability to run in profiles as a user who is not the "owner" of
> the files on disk.
> ...
> I would prefer not to maintain a patched fork of Wine just to get this
> trivial feature. That doesn't benefit anyone. I'm sure w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Hawkins wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
|> Then how about a patch that specifically prevents users from running wine
|> as root over a profile that is not owned by root? I am trying to run wine
|> as a non-root u
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Hawkins wrote:
> | On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |> Ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Hawkins wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> James Hawkins wrote:
|> | On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
|> |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Hawkins wrote:
> | On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> |> Would you consider patches to exchange the uid check for a rwx access
> ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Hawkins wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
|> Would you consider patches to exchange the uid check for a rwx access
check?
| No, that check was added to keep users from running Wine as root.
Then why not prevent user
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Wine developers,
> I am attempting to package Wine for OLPC. My goal is to enable packaging
> individual windows programs into OLPC "Activity bundles" wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Wine developers,
I am attempting to package Wine for OLPC. My goal is to enable packaging
individual windows programs into OLPC "Activity bundles" with wine. I
have encountered a handful of problems along the way. One of them is bug
#12507, for
12 matches
Mail list logo