On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
>> >> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>
> You can see that the userAgent string contains (Kubuntu)...
Oh, right, thanks. I've added a lower-case ubuntu to the list,
can you try again? (The search should be case-
insensitive, but I h
On Sunday 22 February 2009 15:51:31 Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
> >> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> >
> > Konqueror 3.5 on an unknown distribution Linux an unknown CPU!
> > userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.10
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>
> Konqueror 3.5 on an unknown distribution Linux an unknown CPU!
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.10 (like
> Gecko) (Kubuntu)
Yeah, that's https://bugs.launchpad.
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
>
> I'm kind of excited about this
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>> Can we add in a line at the top saying
>> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
>> just like any other Linux application using your
>> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remo
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Remco wrote:
> Filed a bug with "epiphany-browser":
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/332253
Thanks. I filed one for Konqueror,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase/+bug/332340
-Dan
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> > detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown dis
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Windows an unknown CPU!
Firefox 3.0.6 on Windows XP SP3
userAgent
2009/2/21 Dan Kegel :
> Can we add in a line at the top saying
> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> just like any other Linux application using your
> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove,
> select Wine, and click Apply Changes).
I know some versio
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> > Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
> >
> > userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
> > Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
> >
> > I don't think you're gonna be ab
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
> Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
>
> I don't think you're gonna be able to get the distribution name out of
> that... a problem wit
>> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>>
>> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
>> Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
>>
>> I don't think you're gonna be able to get the distribution name out of
>> that... a problem with Epiphany I guess.
Right, same with Ko
And now also to the list:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> Please try again, and paste the entire output page, I've added more info.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> > and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> > I'll fix it up as needed.
>
> It's probably a more useful test if you also print the repo
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It's probably a more useful test if you also print the reported user
agent string. (By the way, Dan, could you somehow
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
You're running
Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
Actually: Epiphany 2.24.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 x86-64
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Erich Hoover wrote:
> You could use the HTTP_USER_AGENT environment variable to do a first-order
> attempt. That way for people with Javascript disabled there's at least a
> chance you'll detect their distribution.
Yeah, we could probably do it all in php instea
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
> > I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
> > can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javasc
Hi Dan,
Firefox 3.1b2 on OpenSolaris 2008.11 returns: 'unknown distribution of
an unknown OS'.
Cheers
Hark
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>> I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
>> can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
>
> Th
2009/2/20 Dan Kegel :
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
You're runni
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
> >> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> >> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
> >
> > Can we also have a non-Javascript page, pleas
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
>>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>>> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
>>
>> On Gentoo with www-client/mozilla-firefox (not mozilla-firefox-bin)
>> the pa
For me, it got Gentoo just fine.
using: www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.1_beta2-r1
"You're using Firefox 3.1 on Gentoo Linux!"
--Murph
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> [...]
>> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
>> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Can we also have a non-Javascript page, please? People with
> accessibility issues, and crufty old curmudge
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
>
> On Gentoo with www-client/mozilla-firefox (not mozilla-firefox-bin)
> the page just detects "unknown distribution Linux".
Try it now..
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
Can we also have a non-Javascript page, please? People with
accessibility issues, and crufty old curmudgeons like me who disable
Javascript by default, would apprec
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It does not my detect distro version. Can that be done?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
[...]
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'l
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
> I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
> can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
Thanks!
Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:47:16AM -0600, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> >
> > Can we add in a line at the top saying
> > "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> > just like any other Linux application using your
> > package
> No argument there, but the thing you want prominently placed is the
> download link, not the thankyou, right?
Oh, sorry; I didn't understand.
I was trying to be honorable on this point by clearly revealing why
that prominent placement was given to us; a truth in advertising
sort of thing.
I ca
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>>> I think we should also move the text
>>> "This endorsement is the primary recognition that CodeWeavers has
>>> requested in exchange for hosting the Wine web site."
>>> to the bottom of the page, and change it to read
>>> "Thanks to CodeWeav
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Can we add in a line at the top saying
> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> just like any other Linux application using your
> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove,
> select Wine, and click
>> I think we should also move the text
>> "This endorsement is the primary recognition that CodeWeavers has
>> requested in exchange for hosting the Wine web site."
>> to the bottom of the page, and change it to read
>> "Thanks to CodeWeavers for hosting WineHQ.org".
>
> +1
To be very honest, th
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:37 AM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>>Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM
>>To: Dan Kegel
>>Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
>>Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
>>
>>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 A
Austin English wrote:
>Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM
>To: Dan Kegel
>Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
>Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
>
>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> Can we add in a line at the top saying
>>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I got email from a friend who complained how
> hard it was to install wine. Turns out he
> assumed he had to go to winehq.org and
> follow the download instructions there,
> when all he needed to do was do
> Applications / Add/Remove and pick W
I got email from a friend who complained how
hard it was to install wine. Turns out he
assumed he had to go to winehq.org and
follow the download instructions there,
when all he needed to do was do
Applications / Add/Remove and pick Wine.
Can we add in a line at the top saying
"Stable version 1.0
38 matches
Mail list logo
