On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:37:59PM -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
>
> > The thing is that Wine actually compiled for me (and apparently for
> > Alexandre as he doesn't commit the patches that doesn't compile) without
> > any warning or an error. A reason it didn't compile for you is a more
> > recent
> The thing is that Wine actually compiled for me (and apparently for
> Alexandre as he doesn't commit the patches that doesn't compile) without
> any warning or an error. A reason it didn't compile for you is a more
> recent gcc version you are using. If you could take that into consideration
> b
"Ivan Gyurdiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree with Mike, how hard would it be to send an one-liner patch
> > instead of complaining?
>
> Probably about as hard as checking that code submissions to
> CVS actually compile, before merging them?
>
> Just hard enough to make me complain, as
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
dialog.c: In function ‘msi_dialog_scrolltext_control’:
dialog.c:516: internal compiler error: in gimple_add_tmp_var, at
gimplify.c:532
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
Prepro
> Next problem:
I guess this is a gcc bug - I'm sorry - will report where appropriate.
--
Ivan Gyurdiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cornell University
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 20:42 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 03:16:26PM -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> > What about this?
> >
> > ../../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../../tools/winebuild -mconsole
> > encode.o protectdata.o testlist.o -o crypt32_test.exe.so
> > -L../../../l
What about this?
basetexture.c:275: error: static declaration of
‘IWineD3DBaseTexture_Vtbl’ follows non-static declaration
wined3d_private.h:495: error: previous declaration of
‘IWineD3DBaseTexture_Vtbl’ was here
make[2]: *** [basetexture.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/phantom/src/wi
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 03:16:26PM -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> What about this?
>
> ../../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../../tools/winebuild -mconsole
> encode.o protectdata.o testlist.o -o crypt32_test.exe.so
> -L../../../libs/port -lwine_port -L../../../dlls -L../../../dlls/crypt32
> -L../..
What about this?
../../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../../tools/winebuild -mconsole
encode.o protectdata.o testlist.o -o crypt32_test.exe.so
-L../../../libs/port -lwine_port -L../../../dlls -L../../../dlls/crypt32
-L../../../libs -lcrypt32
encode.o(.text+0x38): In function `func_encode':
/home/p
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 08:10 -0400, gslink wrote:
> There were a number of update rpms recently posted for gcc. One way to
> cause this problem is to omit loading one of them. This happened to me
> and I believe that one of the updates was not posted with the others.
> All the updates are there
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 08:10 -0400, gslink wrote:
There were a number of update rpms recently posted for gcc. One way to
cause this problem is to omit loading one of them. This happened to me
and I believe that one of the updates was not posted with the others.
A
There were a number of update rpms recently posted for gcc. One way to
cause this problem is to omit loading one of them. This happened to me
and I believe that one of the updates was not posted with the others.
All the updates are there now. The easiest way to check for this
problem is to s
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:58:39 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> But OTOH projects have to do binary incompatible changes a bit before
> the release of the next major version, otherwise there won't be any testing.
> And perhaps glibc is in such a version change phase right now...
No, it's just a totally
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 22:26 -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> I hate bothering the -devel list with compile errors, but
> they don't seem to get fixed, so I start wondering
> if anyone else besides me is using gcc4 at all..
>
> preloader.c: In function ‘is_in_preload_range’:
> preloader.c:863: error:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:22:01PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> >
> > Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> > >I hate bothering the -devel list with compile errors, but
> > >they don't seem to get fixed, so I start wondering
> > >if anyone
Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
I hate bothering the -devel list with compile errors, but
they don't seem to get fixed, so I start wondering
if anyone else besides me is using gcc4 at all..
preloader.c: In function ‘is_in_preload_range’:
preloader.c:863: error: ‘union ’ has no member named ‘a_ptr’
preload
I hate bothering the -devel list with compile errors, but
they don't seem to get fixed, so I start wondering
if anyone else besides me is using gcc4 at all..
preloader.c: In function ‘is_in_preload_range’:
preloader.c:863: error: ‘union ’ has no member named ‘a_ptr’
preloader.c:864: error: ‘union
17 matches
Mail list logo
