Re: Wine binaries size

2008-06-29 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
dAnIK SeNT wrote: > Hi. > Trying to get comfortable with Wine development tools, I noticed one thing > that I'm curious about. When I compile wine 1.1.0 on i686 Ubuntu virtual > machine (I didn't manage to compile it on my "real" x86_64 openSUSE 10.3 > despite all the googling and trying and pai

Re: Wine binaries size

2008-06-29 Thread dAnIK SeNT
Vitaliy, Erich, thank you for your answers! So I don't need to change anything while I'm debugging code. And when I decide to distribute my binaries it will make sense to strip these symbols. > The whole compile directory should actually be about 350MB. The difference > you see is debug informati

Re: Wine binaries size

2008-06-29 Thread Erich Hoover
Most distributions ship "stripped" binaries that have the debugging symbols removed. Run "man strip" at a terminal for details on how to do this post-compile. Erich Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:06 PM, dAnIK SeNT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > Trying to get comfortable

Wine binaries size

2008-06-29 Thread dAnIK SeNT
Hi. Trying to get comfortable with Wine development tools, I noticed one thing that I'm curious about. When I compile wine 1.1.0 on i686 Ubuntu virtual machine (I didn't manage to compile it on my "real" x86_64 openSUSE 10.3 despite all the googling and trying and pain :-)), resulting binaries t