Re: Wine Benchmarks and CAPS

2007-03-29 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Frank Richter wrote: > On 29.03.2007 09:41, Tom Wickline wrote: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/DirectX-Caps > It would be nice if the visual hint could > reflect that - this way a red background would be a clear signal that > "this needs work". I just highligh

Re: Wine Benchmarks and CAPS

2007-03-29 Thread Tom Wickline
On 3/29/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Tom, thanks for the updates! I just wanted to ask about Aquamark. How come there isnt a test with that one? I use it more than I use 3dmark. Hi Tom, I will add Aquamark 3 to the next update, thanks for the suggestion. There is a good revie

Re: Wine Benchmarks and CAPS

2007-03-29 Thread Tom Spear
On 3/29/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have the 0.9.33 page done, and you may notice that Wine regressed in a couple of the test. When looking at these scores you will need to take into account the actual visual quality . The scores were somewhat high in past test because e

Re: Wine Benchmarks and CAPS

2007-03-29 Thread Tom Wickline
On 3/29/07, Frank Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However, presence of a cap is not always better: for example D3DPTEXTURECAPS_CUBEMAP_POW2 - MSDN says that this means "Device requires that cube texture maps have dimensions specified as powers of two." So it's actually better if the flag is a

Re: Wine Benchmarks and CAPS

2007-03-29 Thread Frank Richter
On 29.03.2007 09:41, Tom Wickline wrote: > CAPS results: > http://wiki.winehq.org/DirectX-Caps Some note on the coloring: presumably, a green coloring in the Wine row means "better", red means "worse". For true/false caps those that Wine has but native doesn't are green, while those that Wine doe

Wine Benchmarks and CAPS

2007-03-28 Thread Tom Wickline
Hello, I have the 0.9.33 page done, and you may notice that Wine regressed in a couple of the test. When looking at these scores you will need to take into account the actual visual quality . The scores were somewhat high in past test because everything wasn't being rendered, while that makes for

Re: Wine benchmarks

2005-11-28 Thread Tom Wickline
On 11/28/05, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Quake 3 > > > > Gentoo native the FPS is 400.7 demo 1 > > Wine 0.9.1 FPS 339.6 demo 1 > > > > By native do you mean the linux client for Quake 3? Yes. If so then that's > not a very accurate benchmark comparison. The linux client is

Re: Wine benchmarks

2005-11-28 Thread James Hawkins
> > Quake 3 > > Gentoo native the FPS is 400.7 demo 1 > Wine 0.9.1 FPS 339.6 demo 1 > By native do you mean the linux client for Quake 3? If so then that's not a very accurate benchmark comparison. The linux client is written specifically for linux and the calls are directly into the system, whe

Re: Wine benchmarks

2005-11-28 Thread Tom Wickline
Just in case anyone is reading this thread... With 3DMark 03 I get a score of 560 :-) Tom

Re: Wine benchmarks

2005-11-27 Thread Tom Wickline
On 11/27/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/9/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/9/05, Hans Kristian Rosbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark is getting old, and an update using > > > version 0.9 would be ideal. Any chance at gett

Re: Wine benchmarks

2005-11-26 Thread Tom Wickline
On 11/9/05, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/9/05, Hans Kristian Rosbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark is getting old, and an update using > > version 0.9 would be ideal. Any chance at getting an update using > > the same computer as before? > > Sure

Re: Wine benchmarks

2005-11-09 Thread Tom Wickline
On 11/9/05, Hans Kristian Rosbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark is getting old, and an update using > version 0.9 would be ideal. Any chance at getting an update using > the same computer as before? Sure, it may be a couple days, I plan to update that page soon. >

Wine benchmarks

2005-11-09 Thread Hans Kristian Rosbach
http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark is getting old, and an update using version 0.9 would be ideal. Any chance at getting an update using the same computer as before? A little before & after comparison would also be nice. -A page for Wine 0.9 vs Windows (like today) -Another for Wine 0.9 vs Wine 2005