Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-11 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote: > On 10.08.2009 12:24, Henri Verbeet wrote: >>> at least add a registry key for it and disable it perhaps on 'modern >>> drivers'). What do you guys think? >> Could you do some benchmarking? You can disable XShm support by >> passing "--witho

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-10 Thread Yuriy Kaminskiy
On 10.08.2009 12:24, Henri Verbeet wrote: >> at least add a registry key for it and disable it perhaps on 'modern >> drivers'). What do you guys think? > Could you do some benchmarking? You can disable XShm support by > passing "--without-xshm" to configure. Note that problem is only with *Shm*Pix

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-10 Thread Reece Dunn
2009/8/10 Roderick Colenbrander : > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: >> 2009/8/9 Roderick Colenbrander : >>> I would perhaps suggest that we should perhaps drop XShm support (or >>> at least add a registry key for it and disable it perhaps on 'modern >>> drivers'). What do you

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-10 Thread Rico Schüller
Am 10.08.2009 11:25, schrieb Roderick Colenbrander: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: 2009/8/9 Roderick Colenbrander: I would perhaps suggest that we should perhaps drop XShm support (or at least add a registry key for it and disable it perhaps on 'modern drivers

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-10 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: > 2009/8/9 Roderick Colenbrander : >> I would perhaps suggest that we should perhaps drop XShm support (or >> at least add a registry key for it and disable it perhaps on 'modern >> drivers'). What do you guys think? >> > Could you do some benc

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-10 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/8/9 Roderick Colenbrander : > I would perhaps suggest that we should perhaps drop XShm support (or > at least add a registry key for it and disable it perhaps on 'modern > drivers'). What do you guys think? > Could you do some benchmarking? You can disable XShm support by passing "--without-xs

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-10 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/8/10 Austin English : > So, it hurts performance on applications that are running on modern > drivers without using DIB sections, but helps for applications using > DIB sections, or non-modern drivers? > No, XShm pixmaps are only used for DIB sections, if the application doesn't use those the

Re: Wine and XShm support

2009-08-09 Thread Austin English
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > Hi, > > As of Wine 1.1.27, XShm support was added for the creation of > DIBSECTIONs in winex11.drv. The use of XShm more closely matches to > the Windows behavior and can also bring more performance. > > An Nvidia developer noticed this

Wine and XShm support

2009-08-09 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
Hi, As of Wine 1.1.27, XShm support was added for the creation of DIBSECTIONs in winex11.drv. The use of XShm more closely matches to the Windows behavior and can also bring more performance. An Nvidia developer noticed this change in the ChangeLog and we both wondered why even more XShm code was